Neural Architecture Search Using Unified Gradients to Avoid Overfitting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neural network architecture search methods are inefficient and prone to overfitting, as they often rely on manual trial-and-error processes and are limited by the assumption of differentiability, which can introduce bias and require costly computations.

Innovation Solution

A unified framework for neural architecture search (UNAS) that bridges differentiable and reinforcement-learning-based approaches, enabling the use of both differentiable and non-differentiable objective functions, and trading gradient variance for efficiency without introducing bias, using techniques like Gumbel-Softmax relaxation and REBAR/RELAX gradient estimators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual trial-and-error processes are used for architecture search, then flexibility in exploring architecture space is maintained, but search efficiency and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in exploring architecture spaceVSAvoidsearch efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated neural architecture search where the algorithm autonomously explores the architecture space and selects optimal configurations without manual intervention. The UNAS framework automatically performs gradient estimation, architecture selection, and model training, replacing manual trial-and-error processes while maintaining adaptability through learned architecture parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical search processes with gradient-based optimization methods. By using gradient estimators (REBAR, RELAX) to compute architecture gradients, the system substitutes iterative manual experimentation with continuous differentiable optimization, dramatically improving search efficiency while maintaining flexibility through the unified framework that handles both differentiable and non-differentiable objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If differentiable architecture search methods are used, then search efficiency is improved, but bias is introduced and manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch efficiencyVSAvoidarchitecture search accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces gradient estimators as intermediary mechanisms that bridge the gap between discrete architecture selection and continuous gradient optimization. The REBAR and RELAX estimators provide unbiased or low-bias gradient estimates for architecture parameters, allowing efficient differentiable search while maintaining accuracy by properly accounting for the stochastic nature of architecture sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified framework changes the parameter representation of neural architectures from fixed discrete choices to learnable continuous parameters with categorical distributions. By parameterizing architecture choices as softmax probabilities over operation types and using gradient estimators to update these parameters, the system achieves both efficiency through differentiable optimization and precision through proper statistical modeling of architecture selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If reinforcement-learning-based approaches are used, then unbiased architecture search is achieved, but computational cost and loss of energy increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunbiased architecture searchVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the advantages of differentiable optimization (efficiency) and reinforcement learning (unbiased search) into a unified framework. By combining gradient-based parameter updates with categorical architecture selection and using gradient estimators that leverage both probabilistic modeling and gradient information, the system achieves unbiased or low-bias architecture search at fraction of the computational cost of pure RL approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified framework enables continuous optimization of architecture parameters through gradient updates, avoiding the discrete episodic nature of reinforcement learning. The continuous differentiable formulation allows steady progress through gradient descent, maintaining unbiased search through proper gradient estimation while reducing computational overhead by eliminating repeated environment interactions required in RL.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12175350B2Machine-learning-based architecture search method for a neural network
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 NVIDIA CORP
  • US12175350B2 patent drawing
  • US12175350B2 patent drawing
  • US12175350B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In at least one embodiment, differentiable neural architecture search and reinforcement learning are combined under one framework to discover network architectures with desired properties such as high accuracy, low latency, or both. In at least one embodiment, an objective function for search based on generalization error prevents the selection of architectures prone to overfitting.