Content Evaluation With Neural Networks and Bayesian Confidence Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Companies struggle to accurately predict the success of marketing campaigns without incurring significant costs and risks, as current methods rely on costly live tests and informal learning approaches that do not aggregate learnings across experiments.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using machine learning and Bayesian statistics to analyze content based on historical interaction rates, predicting consumer interaction rates through feature vectors and contextual metadata, with real-time adjustment via an online Bayesian model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If companies conduct live paid tests of advertisements to optimize advertising content, then they can identify winning variations through testing and learning, but this methodology is costly and treats each experiment independently without carrying forward learnings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer interaction rate prediction accuracyVSAvoidmarketing campaign cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of advertising content using machine learning models before live campaigns are launched. By processing image data, text data, and contextual metadata through trained models, the system predicts consumer interaction rates in advance, allowing companies to identify potentially successful campaigns without conducting costly live tests for every variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses historical campaign data as copies of past experiments to train machine learning models. These models then generate predictions for new content by learning patterns from historical interactions, effectively copying knowledge from past successful and unsuccessful campaigns rather than treating each experiment as entirely new.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If companies manually record tests or conduct large multivariate tests using third party platforms, then they can gather data on consumer interactions, but this approach is time-consuming and does not aggregate learnings across experiments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning aggregation across experimentsVSAvoidexperiment execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges data from multiple historical campaigns and experiments into a unified training dataset. The machine learning model aggregates learnings across all these experiments simultaneously, creating a comprehensive understanding of what drives consumer interactions rather than analyzing each experiment in isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous learning where the machine learning model is repeatedly trained on accumulating historical data and continuously improved. Each new campaign's results are fed back into the system to refine future predictions, creating an ongoing cycle of learning that never stops rather than discrete, independent experiments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If companies publish content to gauge consumer interaction rate, then they can obtain real performance data, but this involves large costs and risks to the user's reputation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer interaction rate measurementVSAvoidreputational risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary prediction of consumer interaction rates using machine learning models before content is published. By analyzing historical patterns and processing content features in advance, the system provides estimated performance metrics that allow companies to evaluate content safety and effectiveness without actually publishing potentially problematic content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12462266B2Methods and systems for evaluating content
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 SHUTTERSTOCK AI INT LTD
  • US12462266B2 patent drawing
  • US12462266B2 patent drawing
  • US12462266B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems of evaluating content using neural networks and models. Content to be evaluated is input into a system where it is processed using neural networks. A machine learning model then takes the processed content along with information regarding the context of the content and produces a prior score for each piece of content. The prior score is then used as an input to a Bayesian model, along with further information. The Bayesian model outputs predictions relating to the content, along with confidence levels associated with the predictions.