Neural Conduction Block Modulation via Activity State Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for modulating neural activity in peripheral neural structures lack the ability to control conduction effectively based on activity states, leading to undesired effects such as numbness, discomfort, and interference with autonomic functions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that produce reversible conduction blocks in peripheral neural structures using electrical fields, distinguishing between different activity states to apply blocking stimuli and reverse them accordingly, allowing for controlled modulation of neural activity with minimal inconvenience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous conduction block is applied to peripheral neural structures, then neural activity is effectively modulated, but numbness and discomfort occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural activity modulation effectivenessVSAvoidnumbness and discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic conduction blocks synchronized to the subject's activity states rather than continuous blocking. The system detects activity states and delivers conduction blocks only during appropriate periods, creating a rhythmic on-off pattern that maintains therapeutic effectiveness while allowing neural structures to recover during off periods, thereby reducing numbness and discomfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the timing and duration of conduction blocks based on real-time detection of activity states. Rather than applying fixed continuous blocks, the system adapts the blocking protocol to match the subject's physiological rhythms, optimizing modulation effectiveness while minimizing harmful effects by delivering blocks only when activity state conditions are appropriate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If conduction block is applied without considering activity states, then neural modulation is achieved, but autonomic functions are interfered with

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural modulation effectivenessVSAvoidautonomic function interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor activity states and use this information to control conduction block delivery. By detecting physiological parameters and adjusting blocking timing accordingly, the system ensures that conduction blocks are applied only during activity states that are appropriate for modulation, thereby avoiding interference with critical autonomic functions while maintaining effective neural modulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the conduction block protocol based on real-time activity state detection. It adjusts the timing, duration, and intensity of blocks to match physiological conditions, ensuring that blocking occurs only when it will be therapeutically beneficial and not when it would disrupt essential autonomic processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional neural modulation methods are used, then some neural activity is controlled, but the ability to distinguish and respond to different activity states is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to different activity statesVSAvoidconduction control effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from activity state detection to intelligently control conduction block delivery. By monitoring physiological parameters and using this information to adjust blocking timing, the system achieves both high adaptability to different activity states and reliable conduction control, as blocks are delivered only when activity state conditions indicate appropriate timing for effective modulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables desired effects like modulation of immune or inflammatory responses while minimizing discomfort and autonomic interference by synchronizing blocking stimuli with specific activity states.

Implementation Method 1

producing a reversible conduction block in a peripheral neural structure of a subject with an electrical field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical field blocking: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS8195287B2Method for electrical modulation of neural conduction
Publication Date: 2012.06.05 SOOVU LABS INC
  • US8195287B2 patent drawing
  • US8195287B2 patent drawing
  • US8195287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and related systems for modulating neural activity by repetitively blocking conduction in peripheral neural structures with electrical stimuli are disclosed. Methods and systems for reversing effects of blocking stimuli and/or for producing substantially permanent conduction block are also disclosed.