Parallel Neural Network DAG Coordination for Flexible Distributed Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current distributed computing methods for training neural networks require significant user involvement and are inflexible, necessitating re-programming for configuration changes, and lack efficient mechanisms for data communication between nodes.

Innovation Solution

A distributed computing system that divides and traverses directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) across multiple nodes, using data exchange vertices to facilitate communication and gradient calculation, enabling synchronous or asynchronous updates of weights in cloned DAGs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a master-slave distributed computing model is used, then control and coordination of computing operations is achieved, but flexibility is reduced and re-programming is required for configuration changes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates clone DAGs that are identical copies of the original DAG structure. These clones allow parallel execution without requiring re-programming, as the cloning process automatically replicates the computational graph. This resolves the contradiction by enabling flexibility through copying rather than re-programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically creates and manages clone DAGs based on training requirements. The ability to dynamically instantiate clones without re-programming provides flexibility while maintaining the structured control of the original DAG. This dynamic approach eliminates the need for static, pre-programmed configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If significant user involvement is required for programming slave operations and master control, then customized computing operations can be achieved, but ease of operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service through automatic clone creation and management. The master node automatically creates and coordinates clone DAGs without requiring user intervention in programming slave operations. This self-service mechanism improves ease of operation while maintaining high automation levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the computing workload into independent clone DAGs that can be automatically managed. Each clone is a self-contained unit that can be created and executed without manual programming, reducing the burden on users while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If data communication mechanisms between nodes are not optimized, then system simplicity is maintained, but training efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidcommunication mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces data exchange vertices as intermediaries between nodes in the DAG. These vertices facilitate efficient data communication without requiring complex custom communication mechanisms. The intermediary approach improves training efficiency by providing structured data flow paths while keeping the communication mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If clone DAGs are used for parallel training, then training speed is improved, but gradient aggregation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining speedVSAvoidgradient aggregation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges gradients from multiple clone DAGs through aggregation at the master node. This merging process combines the results from parallel clones into a unified weight update, improving training speed through parallelism while managing aggregation complexity through systematic combination of gradient data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12547875B2Automated setup and communication coordination for training and utilizing massively parallel neural networks
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12547875B2 patent drawing
  • US12547875B2 patent drawing
  • US12547875B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is disclosed for training and utilizing massively parallel neural networks. A distributed computing system may be configured to perform various operations. The distributed computing system may divide a directed acyclic graph (“DAG”) that comprises a plurality of vertices linked in pairwise relationships via a plurality of edges among a plurality of nodes. Each node may comprise a computing device. The distributed computing system may provide a map of the DAG that described a flow of data through the vertices to each of the vertices of the DAG. The distributed computing system may perform a topological sort of the vertices of the DAG and may traverse the DAG.