Neural Data Compression with Content-Adaptive Latent Refinement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional neural network-based image compression methods optimize the encoder and decoder functions over a corpus of images, failing to adapt efficiently to individual image content, leading to suboptimal rate-distortion performance.

Innovation Solution

A content adaptive optimization approach that refines latent representations on a per-image basis without altering the neural network or predictive model parameters, using an iterative procedure to adjust latent values for improved rate-distortion performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional neural network-based approaches optimize encoder and decoder functions over a corpus of images, then the compression method achieves generalization across multiple images, but it fails to adapt efficiently to individual image content resulting in suboptimal rate-distortion performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to individual image contentVSAvoidrate-distortion performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary optimization of the neural network parameters over a corpus of images during a training phase. This preliminary action establishes a baseline encoder and decoder that work well across multiple images, but then allows for content-adaptive refinement during actual compression by optimizing latent representations for each specific image, thus achieving both generalization and individual adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics by allowing the latent representations to be adaptively optimized for each specific image content while keeping the neural network architecture fixed. This dynamic adjustment of latent variables based on individual image characteristics enables the system to achieve optimal rate-distortion performance for each image without requiring retraining of the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If the neural network parameters are retrained for each individual image to achieve optimal rate-distortion performance, then adaptation to specific content improves, but the computational complexity and training time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate-distortion performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the content-adaptive optimization from the neural network training process itself. Instead of retraining the entire network for each image, it separates the global network parameter optimization (done once over a corpus) from the local latent representation optimization (done per image). This extraction allows efficient per-image adaptation without the computational burden of full network retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial optimization by focusing computational effort only on optimizing the latent representations rather than the entire network. This partial action achieves the necessary adaptation for each image without the excessive computational cost of complete network retraining, balancing performance improvement with computational feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If hand-crafted compression components are used, then the compression system achieves interpretability and control over individual components, but it lacks the adaptive learning capabilities of neural networks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning capabilityVSAvoidinterpretability and control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the strengths of both approaches by using a universal neural network framework that can perform both the adaptive learning of compression functions and maintain interpretability through its structured architecture. The neural network learns optimal compression strategies adaptively while the latent representation space provides a controllable and interpretable intermediate form that bridges the gap between black-box learning and hand-crafted design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3970371B1Content adaptive optimization for neural data compression
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 DISNEY ENTERPRISES INC
  • EP3970371B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3970371B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3970371B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A data processing system includes a computing platform having a hardware processor and a memory storing a data compression software code. The hardware processor executes the data compression software code to receive a series of compression input data and encode a first compression input data of the series to a latent space representation of the first compression input data. The data compression software code further decodes the latent space representation to produce an. input space representation of the first compression input data corresponding to the latent space representation, and generates f refined latent values for re-encoding the first compression input data based on a comparison of the first compression input data with its input space representation. The data compression software code then re-encodes the first compression input data using the refined latent values to produce a first compressed data corresponding to the first compression input data.