Neural Network Evaluation of Electronic Device Cosmetic Condition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating the physical and cosmetic condition of electronic devices, such as mobile phones, are inefficient, costly, and prone to inconsistent results due to manual inspection and the inability to differentiate between device features and defects.

Innovation Solution

The use of machine learning techniques, specifically artificial neural networks, to analyze images of electronic devices and evaluate their cosmetic condition without predefined features or rules, providing improved computational efficiency, detection accuracy, and system robustness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inspection is used to evaluate device condition, then human judgment can identify defects, but the process is slow, costly, and yields inconsistent results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidevaluation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical inspection process with an automated image processing system using neural networks. The system captures images of device surfaces and uses machine learning algorithms to automatically detect scratches, cracks, and other cosmetic defects, eliminating the need for human inspectors while maintaining high detection accuracy and significantly increasing evaluation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate image processing layer between the device and the evaluation result. Images are captured under controlled lighting conditions and processed through neural network algorithms that serve as intermediaries to identify defects, providing a consistent and reproducible evaluation process that bridges the gap between physical inspection and digital analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual inspection is used, then defects can be identified, but the process is cumbersome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation consistencyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual inspection with automated neural network-based image analysis. The system processes multiple images of device surfaces rapidly, providing consistent and reliable defect identification without the variability inherent in human judgment, while reducing inspection time from minutes per device to seconds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by capturing multiple images under different lighting conditions and angles before the actual evaluation. This pre-processing step ensures that all potential defects are visible in the image set, allowing the neural network to make accurate determinations without requiring repeated manual inspections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional image processing with predefined features is used, then specific defects can be detected, but the system lacks robustness and cannot differentiate between features and defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect identification capabilityVSAvoidsystem robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of defect detection from rule-based feature matching to learning-based pattern recognition. Instead of using predefined thresholds and geometric rules, the neural network learns optimal parameters for identifying defects versus normal features during training, enabling the system to adapt to different device types and defect variations while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptability by training neural networks on diverse datasets that include various device models, lighting conditions, and defect types. The system dynamically adjusts its detection parameters based on the specific input images and device characteristics, rather than relying on static predefined rules, thereby improving both versatility and robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250292526A1Neural network based physical condition evaluation of electronic devices, and associated systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 ECOATM LLC
  • US20250292526A1 patent drawing
  • US20250292526A1 patent drawing
  • US20250292526A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for evaluating the physical and/or cosmetic condition of electronic devices using machine learning techniques are disclosed. In one example aspect, an example system includes a kiosk that comprises an inspection plate configured to hold an electronic device, one or more light sources arranged above the inspection plate configured to direct one or more light beams towards the electronic device, and one or more cameras configured to capture at least one image of a first side of the electronic device. The system also includes one or more processors in communication with the one or more cameras configured to extract a set of features of the electronic device and determine, via a first neural network, a condition of the electronic device based on the set of features.