Neural Device Training Modulation via Adaptive Parameter Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Training neural devices with artificial nervous systems is time-consuming, and existing methods lack the ability to efficiently modulate training parameters externally, limiting the acceleration of learning processes.

Innovation Solution

A system that observes neural devices in a training environment and modulates training parameters, such as learning rates and synaptic plasticity, using a combination of automated and manual controls to adjust environmental stimuli and neural model parameters, allowing for adaptive and efficient training.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional training methods are used for neural devices, then training can be performed with standard procedures, but training time is excessively long and training efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making training parameters adaptive rather than fixed. The system dynamically adjusts learning rates and other training parameters based on real-time observations of neural device performance, allowing the training process to self-optimize and accelerate convergence, thereby reducing training time while maintaining effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the neural device's performance is continuously observed and used to modulate training parameters. This closed-loop approach allows the system to learn from its own behavior during training and adjust parameters to optimize learning efficiency, directly addressing the time-consuming nature of traditional training methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If training parameters are modulated externally, then training speed can be increased, but system complexity increases due to additional control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining speedVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by enabling the neural device to autonomously observe its own performance and modulate its own training parameters. This internal self-regulation mechanism eliminates the need for complex external control systems while still achieving accelerated training, as the device uses its own neural architecture to monitor and adjust learning processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements multi-functionality by designing a unified system where the neural device's neural architecture serves dual purposes: both performing the target computational task and simultaneously monitoring performance for training optimization. This universal approach allows the same system components to fulfill multiple functions without adding separate dedicated control hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9542644B2Methods and apparatus for modulating the training of a neural device
Publication Date: 2017.01.10 QUALCOMM INC
  • US9542644B2 patent drawing
  • US9542644B2 patent drawing
  • US9542644B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus are provided for training a neural device having an artificial nervous system by modulating at least one training parameter during the training. One example method for training a neural device having an artificial nervous system generally includes observing the neural device in a training environment and modulating at least one training parameter based at least in part on the observing. For example, the training apparatus described herein may modify the neural device's internal learning mechanisms (e.g., spike rate, learning rate, neuromodulators, sensor sensitivity, etc.) and/or the training environment's stimuli (e.g., move a flame closer to the device, make the scene darker, etc.). In this manner, the speed with which the neural device is trained (i.e., the training rate) may be significantly increased compared to conventional neural device training systems.