Neural Network Dose Prediction for Radiation Therapy Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radiation therapy treatment planning is inefficient and prone to poor plan quality due to the trial-and-error nature of the process, requiring extensive consultation between treatment planners and physicians, and is heavily dependent on human expertise and experience.

Innovation Solution

A computer system utilizing neural network architectures for volumetric dose prediction in cancer treatment planning, capable of predicting clinically acceptable and Pareto optimal dose distributions for various cancer sites, including head-and-neck, lung, and prostate cancer, by learning from a large dataset of dose volume histograms and volumetric dose distributions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional trial-and-error treatment planning is used, then treatment plans can be customized for individual patients, but planning time is excessively long (up to a week) and plan quality varies significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividualized treatment planVSAvoidplanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing optimal treatment plans for various patient scenarios in a database during the training phase. When a new patient is encountered, the system quickly retrieves and adapts pre-computed plans rather than performing trial-and-error optimization, dramatically reducing planning time while maintaining individualization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of previously optimized treatment plans from the database and adapts them to individual patient characteristics. This copying approach allows rapid generation of customized plans by modifying proven templates rather than creating plans from scratch for each patient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple rounds of consultation between planner and physician are conducted, then plan quality can be improved to meet physician satisfaction, but the complexity of the planning process increases and time consumption escalates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplan qualityVSAvoidplanning process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically generating high-quality treatment plans using pre-trained models that encode physician preferences and clinical guidelines. The database of optimal plans was created through expert input, and the system now independently retrieves and adapts these plans without requiring multiple iterative consultations, reducing process complexity while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If deep learning models are trained on large datasets of dose volume histograms and volumetric dose distributions, then prediction accuracy and plan quality improve, but computational complexity and training time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedose prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by conducting extensive model training and data processing in advance to build a comprehensive database of optimal treatment plans. This upfront investment in computational complexity during the training phase enables rapid, accurate predictions during clinical use without requiring complex real-time computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If treatment planning is highly dependent on human expertise and experience, then plans can benefit from clinical judgment, but consistency and reproducibility of plan quality deteriorate due to varying skill levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclinical judgmentVSAvoidplan quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system copies the expertise and judgment of experienced planners and physicians into the training data and pre-computed database. By encoding clinical judgment from multiple experts during the training phase, the system achieves consistent reproduction of high-quality plans that reflect collective expert knowledge, eliminating variability due to individual skill differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12308101B2Deep learning based dosed prediction for treatment planning and quality assurance in radiation therapy
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST
  • US12308101B2 patent drawing
  • US12308101B2 patent drawing
  • US12308101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for generating a treatment plan are disclosed herein. A computing system receives a plurality of dose volume histograms for a plurality of patients and a plurality of volumetric dose distributions corresponding to the plurality of dose volume histograms. The computing system generates a volumetric dose prediction model using a neural network by learning, by the neural network, a relationship between a plurality of dose volume histograms for the plurality of patients and the corresponding plurality of volumetric dose distributions. The computing system receives a candidate dose volume histogram for a target patient. The computing system infers, via the volumetric dose prediction module, a volumetric dose prediction distribution matching the candidate dose volume histogram. The computing system generates a recommendation based on the inferred volumetric dose prediction distribution.