Neural Entity Alignment Across Time for Unsupervised Object Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deep learning models excel in segmenting scenes into component objects but fail to maintain object correspondence across different time steps, hindering their application in tasks requiring tracking environments over multiple time points.

Innovation Solution

A neural network-based system aligns entities across time using attention-based mechanisms, generating alignment outputs without supervision, enabling consistent tracking of objects through feature representations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If deep learning models segment scenes into component objects, then object detection accuracy is improved, but object correspondence across time steps deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection accuracyVSAvoidobject correspondence across time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension to the object segmentation problem by processing sequences of images and maintaining object identities across time steps. The model transitions from spatial-only segmentation to spatio-temporal segmentation, adding the time dimension as a new axis for analyzing object correspondence and persistence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the model's predictions about object correspondence are used to refine subsequent predictions. The learned associations between objects across time steps are fed back into the model to improve ongoing tracking and segmentation, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves object correspondence reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If object tracking across multiple time points is implemented, then tracking capability is improved, but computational complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking capabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the tracking problem into independent learnable components by dividing objects into discrete entities with unique identifiers. Each object is processed as a separate segment with its own feature representation, allowing parallel computation and reducing the overall computational burden compared to processing the entire scene as a single unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the tracking problem by changing parameters from pixel-level operations to object-level feature representations. By extracting and processing high-level semantic features rather than raw pixel data, the computational complexity is reduced while maintaining tracking capability across multiple time steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If unsupervised alignment is used, then ground truth requirement is eliminated, but alignment precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment implementation easeVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service alignment where the model learns to align objects across time steps using only its own predictions and internal consistency constraints. The system serves its own alignment needs without external supervision by leveraging temporal coherence and object persistence principles embedded in the model architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary alignment actions during the training phase by establishing object correspondences based on feature similarity and temporal continuity. These preliminary alignments are learned in advance and used to guide subsequent alignment decisions, improving precision without requiring ground truth labels during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12488579B2Aligning entities using neural networks
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US12488579B2 patent drawing
  • US12488579B2 patent drawing
  • US12488579B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for aligning entities across time. One of the methods includes obtaining respective current feature representations for each of a set of current entities that have been detected in an environment at a current time point; obtaining respective historical feature representations for each of a set of historical entities that have been detected in the environment at one or more earlier time points preceding the current time point; and processing an alignment input comprising (i) the respective historical feature representations for the set of historical entities and (ii) the current feature representations for the set of current entities using an alignment neural network to generate an alignment output that defines, for each of one or more of the current entities, a corresponding historical entity that is the same as the current entity.