Neural Feedback for DBS Lead Placement and Stimulation Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems face challenges in optimizing electrode placement and stimulation parameters due to non-selective activation of neural elements, leading to potential cognitive impairments and fluctuating therapeutic effects, especially in conditions like Parkinson's disease, where brain dynamics and medication states impact treatment efficacy.

Innovation Solution

An implantable pulse generator (IPG) with control circuitry that records electrical signals, classifies them for evoked neural responses, extracts features, and adjusts stimulation based on these responses to optimize lead placement and parameters, using methods such as peak detection and frequency analysis to ensure targeted neural activation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If DBS is applied to treat neurological disorders, then therapeutic benefit is provided, but non-selective activation of neural elements causes cognitive impairments and side effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic benefitVSAvoidcognitive impairments and side effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode array is divided into multiple independently controllable electrodes or electrode groups distributed at different locations. This segmentation allows selective activation of specific neural pathways while avoiding non-target areas, thereby providing therapeutic benefit without causing cognitive impairments and side effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different electrodes or electrode groups are assigned different stimulation parameters (amplitude, frequency, pulse width) tailored to their specific locations and target populations. This local differentiation enables precise control over which neural elements are activated, improving therapeutic efficacy while minimizing harmful effects on cognitive functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If stimulation parameters are increased to improve therapeutic effect, then treatment efficacy is enhanced, but energy consumption increases and non-target tissue stimulation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the stimulation into multiple discrete electrode activations with optimized parameters for each segment, the system achieves effective treatment with lower overall energy consumption compared to single high-amplitude stimulation of the entire area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies stimulation to only the necessary portions of the target area using selective electrode activation, avoiding excessive stimulation of non-target tissues. This partial action approach reduces energy waste while maintaining sufficient therapeutic effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If DBS is applied with fixed parameters, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to changing patient needs and brain dynamics is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment mechanismVSAvoidadaptability to changing patient needs
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The stimulation parameters are made dynamically adjustable based on real-time or near-real-time feedback from neural recordings. The system can adapt electrode activation patterns, amplitude, frequency, and pulse width in response to changing brain states, patient response, and disease progression, thereby improving adaptability without requiring overly complex manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Neural signals recorded from the electrode array or separate recording electrodes are processed to provide feedback on stimulation effectiveness and neural state. This feedback loop enables automatic or semi-automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters, enhancing adaptability to changing patient needs while keeping the control system manageable through intelligent algorithms rather than complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Area of stationary object

If multiple electrodes are used to improve stimulation coverage, then treatment coverage is enhanced, but difficulty in detecting and measuring optimal parameters increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation coverageVSAvoidparameter optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-electrode array is controlled as independent segments, each capable of being optimized separately. This segmentation allows systematic evaluation of each electrode's contribution to stimulation coverage and therapeutic effect, making parameter optimization more manageable despite the increased number of electrodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Neural feedback signals are used to identify which electrodes are most effective at activating target neural populations and which produce unwanted effects. This feedback enables automated or guided optimization of parameters for each electrode, reducing the manual measurement and tuning burden that would otherwise increase with more electrodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the precision of DBS by minimizing non-target tissue stimulation, reducing side effects, and adapting to changing patient needs, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes and patient-specific treatment efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

record an electrical signal at a second one or more of the plurality of electrode nodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal detection: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

converting the recorded electrical signal from a time domain signal to a frequency domain signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFast Fourier Transform:

Implementation Method 3

electrical pulses can be delivered from the neurostimulator to the stimulation electrode(s) to stimulate or activate a volume of tissue

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentEP4591922A1Neural feedback assisted dbs
Publication Date: 2025.07.30 BOSTON SCI NEUROMODULATION CORP
  • EP4591922A1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4591922A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~3
  • EP4591922A1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The present invention discloses a system for facilitating the implantation of an electrode lead in the brain of a patient, wherein the electrode lead comprises a plurality of electrodes, the system comprising control circuitry configured to receive an indication that the lead is positioned at a first position in the patient's brain, use one or more of the electrodes to apply stimulation at one or more stimulation locations upon the lead, record electrical signals at one or more of the plurality of electrodes, classify the recorded electrical signals according to one or more classification criteria to determine if the recorded electrical signals contain an evoked neural response of interest, if the recorded electrical signals contain a neural response of interest, extract one or more features of the neural response of interest, and use the one or more features to determine one or more of (i) whether to move the lead to a new position or (ii) to adjust stimulation parameters based on the evoked responses.