Neural Optimization of Grayscale Release Strategies Under Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing grayscale release strategies for enterprise-level applications are cumbersome and time-consuming, requiring manual intervention due to complex microservice dependencies, making it difficult to dynamically adapt traffic grouping and resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that employs neural networks to define state and action spaces, generate composite reward functions, and optimize grayscale release strategies based on multi-objective optimization, allowing for intelligent and automated traffic control without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual intervention is used to control grayscale release strategies, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but the process becomes cumbersome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control flexibilityVSAvoidrelease strategy generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the grayscale release strategy to automatically adjust traffic ratios and deployment parameters based on real-time system state and predefined objectives, eliminating the need for continuous manual intervention while maintaining adaptive control capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with an automated neural network-based decision system that processes system state vectors and generates optimal release strategies through computational models, substituting human operational effort with intelligent automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual intervention is required for traffic grouping and resource allocation, then complex microservice dependencies can be managed, but the process becomes time-consuming and less dynamic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to system state changesVSAvoidtime for strategy adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback mechanisms where the neural network monitors system state vectors in real-time and automatically adjusts traffic grouping and resource allocation based on observed performance metrics, enabling dynamic adaptation without time-consuming manual review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptability by allowing the release strategy to automatically adjust parameters such as traffic ratios and deployment pacing based on real-time system conditions, transforming static manual plans into living, self-adjusting systems that respond instantly to changing microservice dependencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If automated neural network optimization is applied, then efficiency and stability are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelease strategy optimization efficiencyVSAvoidneural network and state space definition
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages complexity by parameterizing the system state as vectors and defining the action space through discrete traffic ratio adjustments, transforming complex microservice dependency management into a structured optimization problem with manageable parameters and clear state representations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250292097A1Optimizing grayscale release strategies based on multiple objectives and constraints
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250292097A1 patent drawing
  • US20250292097A1 patent drawing
  • US20250292097A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment for dynamically generating grayscale release strategies based on multi-objective optimization. The embodiment may define current state vector spaces and an action space for a target system. The embodiment may generate a composite reward function based on one or more objective-based reward functions and one or more constraint-based reward functions. The embodiment may generate, using a first network, candidate action vectors based on the defined current state vector spaces and the defined action space, the candidate action vectors corresponding to action probabilities. The embodiment may calculate, using a second network, state value functions based on the candidate action vectors. The embodiment may execute, in training iterations, actions corresponding to the candidate action vectors to obtain environment feedback including observed rewards. The embodiment may optimize the first and second networks. The embodiment may generate gray release strategies including a series of optimized actions to be taken.