Neural Network Hyperparameter Tuning Using Smoothing Splines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for configuring neural networks are time-consuming, computationally expensive, and prone to errors due to naive or inefficient methods for selecting hyperparameter values, leading to suboptimal performance and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

The use of smoothing splines, specifically polyharmonic splines, to approximate the objective function and determine optimal hyperparameter values through iterative processes, reducing the need for extensive training iterations and computational resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional exhaustive search methods are used to configure neural network hyperparameters, then comprehensive evaluation of parameter combinations is achieved, but computational cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehyperparameter optimization accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a surrogate model (copy) of the objective function using smoothing splines that approximates the relationship between hyperparameters and performance. This surrogate model can be evaluated quickly without actual neural network training, replacing expensive original evaluations while maintaining optimization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary sampling of the hyperparameter space to build the spline approximation before actual optimization. This preliminary action creates a foundation model that guides subsequent hyperparameter selection, avoiding exhaustive search while maintaining comprehensive evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If exhaustive hyperparameter search is performed to ensure optimal performance, then accuracy is improved, but computational resources are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural network performanceVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The surrogate model created by spline approximation serves as a computational copy that predicts performance outcomes without requiring actual neural network training. This copy consumes minimal resources while providing reliable guidance for hyperparameter selection, maintaining performance quality while reducing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the optimization problem from directly evaluating neural network performance to optimizing the spline approximation parameters. This parameter transformation allows efficient exploration of hyperparameter space using mathematical optimization on the surrogate model rather than expensive neural network training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If naive hyperparameter selection methods are used, then configuration speed is improved, but accuracy and performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration speedVSAvoidhyperparameter selection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The spline-based surrogate model provides an accurate mathematical representation of the objective function, enabling precise hyperparameter selection through optimization of the approximation rather than random or naive selection. This maintains high accuracy while achieving fast configuration speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the spline approximation to provide continuous feedback about expected performance across the hyperparameter space. This feedback mechanism guides the optimization process toward high-performance regions without requiring exhaustive trial-and-error testing, improving both speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12468931B2Configuring a neural network using smoothing splines
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12468931B2 patent drawing
  • US12468931B2 patent drawing
  • US12468931B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment includes identifying an initial plurality of sets of hyperparameter values at which to evaluate an objective function that relates hyperparameter values to performance values of a neural network. The embodiment also executes training processes on the neural network with the hyperparameters set to the each of the initial sets of hyperparameter values such that the training process provides an initial set of the performance values for the objective function. The embodiment also generates an approximation of the objective function using splines at selected performance values. The embodiment approximates a point at which the approximation of the objective function reaches a maximum value, then determines an updated set of hyperparameter values associated with the maximum value. The embodiment then executes a runtime process using the neural network with the hyperparameters set to the updated set of hyperparameter values.