Neural Network Inference Privacy Using Adaptive Laplace Perturbation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The prevalent use of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in cloud-based inference poses significant privacy risks as raw data sent to the cloud can be misused or leaked, compromising user privacy without significant sacrifice of neural network performance.

Innovation Solution

The method involves optimizing stochastic perturbations using Laplace distributions to obfuscate private data features before inference, ensuring ε-differential privacy and minimizing mutual information loss while maintaining inference accuracy, without altering the pre-trained neural network architecture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If stochastic perturbations are added to obfuscate private data features, then data privacy is improved, but inference accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemutual informationVSAvoidinference accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the scale parameters of Laplace distributions for stochastic perturbations. The loss function includes terms that control the trade-off between privacy (mutual information reduction) and utility (inference accuracy), allowing dynamic adjustment of perturbation强度 to achieve optimal balance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the perturbation parameters adaptive rather than static. The scale parameters of the Laplace distributions are optimized through gradient descent based on the loss function, allowing the system to dynamically adjust the amount of perturbation applied to different features based on their importance to the inference task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If stochastic perturbations are added to protect data privacy, then privacy security is improved, but data utility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy riskVSAvoidinference performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the inference performance as a signal to adjust the perturbation parameters. The loss function incorporates the inference accuracy metric, and gradient descent uses the performance feedback to iteratively optimize the scale parameters, ensuring that privacy protection does not excessively degrade utility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters of the perturbation distributions based on the observed trade-off between privacy and utility. The scale parameters are continuously adjusted to find the optimal point where privacy protection is maximized while maintaining acceptable inference performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If optimal stochastic perturbations are found using optimization, then privacy protection is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation contentVSAvoidoptimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex combinatorial optimization methods with gradient-based optimization. By formulating the problem as differentiable optimization with a smooth loss function, the system can use efficient gradient descent algorithms rather than exhaustive search or complex discrete optimization methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization focuses on finding optimal parameters for a parametric family of distributions (Laplace distributions) rather than searching through all possible perturbation functions. This parameterization reduces the search space and makes the optimization computationally tractable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4722968A2Methods of providing data privacy for neural network based inference
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • EP4722968A2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4722968A2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4722968A2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and systems that provide data privacy for implementing a neural network-based inference are described. A method includes injecting stochasticity into the data to produce perturbed data, wherein the injected stochasticity satisfies an ε-differential privacy criterion and transmitting the perturbed data to a neural network or to a partition of the neural network for inference.