Neural Interface System with 3D Electrode Array

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) devices face limitations in fine electrode positioning, selectivity, and precise stimulation patterning due to their design, which results in significant behavioral and cognitive side effects and limited therapeutic efficacy.

Innovation Solution

A neural interface system featuring a three-dimensional electrode array with a triangular lattice pattern of electrode sites arranged circumferentially and axially around a carrier, allowing for precise activation patterns and reduced power consumption, along with a carrier that supports the electrode array and facilitates fluidic channels for drug delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional DBS electrodes with four relatively large electrodes positioned along a single axis are used, then the device structure is simple and ease of manufacture is improved, but fine electrode positioning capability deteriorates and stimulation selectivity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidfine electrode positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from conventional single-axis linear electrode arrangement to a three-dimensional electrode array configuration. The electrode array includes multiple electrodes positioned in three dimensions around the carrier, enabling fine positioning capability while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standardized array structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the conventional single electrode into multiple discrete electrodes arranged in an array configuration. This segmentation allows independent control and positioning of each electrode, achieving fine positioning capability while the modular array structure maintains ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If conventional DBS electrodes with all electrode sites positioned along a single axis are used, then device complexity is reduced, but stimulation patterning precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidstimulation patterning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a three-dimensional electrode array where electrodes are positioned not only axially but also circumferentially around the carrier. This multi-dimensional arrangement enables precise stimulation patterning by selecting specific electrode combinations, while the systematic array structure keeps device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If conventional DBS electrodes are used, then the therapeutic effect is limited by electrode position dependency, but the device structure remains simple

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidtherapeutic effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic stimulation system where the stimulation pattern can be adjusted by selecting different combinations of electrodes within the three-dimensional array. This dynamic configurability allows optimization of therapeutic effect for different patient needs and electrode positions, while the underlying array structure remains relatively simple and systematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If a three-dimensional electrode array with triangular lattice pattern is implemented, then fine electrode positioning and stimulation selectivity are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefine electrode positioningVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a three-dimensional electrode array with triangular lattice pattern arranged circumferentially and axially around a carrier. This geometric configuration achieves fine positioning precision through its structured geometry, while the regular lattice pattern and modular design around a central carrier keep the overall device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP2488098B1Neural interface system
Publication Date: 2014.03.19 NEURONEXUS TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP2488098B1 patent drawingFigure 1(A)~2
  • EP2488098B1 patent drawingFigure 3(A)~7(C)
  • EP2488098B1 patent drawingFigure 8~9

AI summary

A neural interface system including an electrode array and a carrier that supports the electrode array, in which the electrode array includes a substrate rolled into a three- dimensional shape, a plurality of conductive traces patterned on the substrate and adapted to transmit electrical signals, and a plurality of elliptically shaped, externally facing electrode sites coupled to the plurality of conductive traces that electrically communicate with their surroundings. The plurality of electrodes are arranged in a triangular lattice circumferentially around and axially along the carrier, and the substrate includes an edge that extends axially along the carrier and is constrained between a first axial row portion of the plurality of electrode sites and a second axial row portion of the plurality of electrode sites adjacent to the first axial row portion.