Neural Model Quality Assurance With Generative Prototypes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing discriminative neural networks struggle to reliably classify input data records that deviate significantly from the training data, leading to issues such as overfitting and inaccurate classifications, particularly in medical imaging where technical parameters like contrast range and image resolution vary.

Innovation Solution

A system combining a discriminative neural network classifier with a generative neural network model-based sample generator, trained on the same data, generates artificial prototypes to determine the reliability of classifications by assessing the similarity of input data records to these prototypes, using loss functions or similarity metrics to establish a parameter space for reliable classification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a discriminative neural network is trained on training data records, then it can classify objects within the training data distribution, but it fails to reliably classify input data records that deviate significantly from the training data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification reliabilityVSAvoidadaptability to out-of-distribution data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by generating artificial prototype data records before actual classification tasks. These prototypes are created using a generative neural network trained on the training data distribution, establishing a reference framework in advance that helps evaluate whether new input data falls within the reliable classification range, thus preparing the system beforehand for out-of-distribution detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism by using artificial prototype data records as mediators between the training data and new input data. These prototypes serve as reference points that bridge the gap, allowing the system to compare new inputs against established prototypes to determine if they deviate significantly, thus enabling reliable classification boundaries without direct exposure to out-of-distribution data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the classifier is trained to recognize patterns in training data, then it achieves good accuracy on training data, but it overfits and produces inaccurate classifications on novel data with different technical parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidgeneralization reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by creating artificial copies of the training data distribution through generative neural networks. These synthetic prototype data records replicate the statistical properties and technical parameter ranges of the training data, providing a safe reference framework that prevents overfitting to specific training samples while maintaining accurate pattern recognition for in-distribution data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If technical parameters like contrast range and image resolution vary in input data, then the classifier encounters out-of-distribution data, but existing systems lack a mechanism to identify such variations and maintain reliable classification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling of parameter variationsVSAvoidclassification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying technical parameters (such as contrast range, image resolution, and other acquisition parameters) when generating artificial prototype data records. This creates a comprehensive reference framework that encompasses the expected range of parameter variations, enabling the system to identify when new inputs fall outside this range and maintain reliable classification by detecting these parameter deviations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12430538B2System and method for the quality assurance of data-based models
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 AICURA MEDICAL GMBH
  • US12430538B2 patent drawing
  • US12430538B2 patent drawing
  • US12430538B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a system which, on the one hand, has a classifier that is formed by a discriminative neural network and that implements a binary class model or a multi-class model. On the other hand, the system has a model-based sample generator that is formed by a generative neural network. Both the classifier and the model-based sample generator are trained—for a corresponding class—with the same training data records and therefore embody models that correspond to one another for this class.The invention also relates to a method for determining a quality criterion for input data records for a classifier with a discriminative neural network. The classifier has been trained with training data records and represents a classification model for a class.According to the method, a model-based sample generator with a generative neural network is initially provided and trained with the same training data records that were used to train the classifier.Subsequently, by means of the trained model-based sample generator and an input data record based on random values, an artificial data record is generated, which is representative of the classification model embodied by the classifier.The artificial data record generated by the trained generator, or at least a parameter derived from it, is used to test the input data records as to their suitability for classification or regression.