Neural Network Adapter Approximation for Accelerator-Efficient Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neural networks require significant computational resources and time for adaptation to various machine learning tasks, especially when using hardware accelerators like GPUs, FGPAs, and ASICs, due to the high number of parameters and operations involved.

Innovation Solution

The technique involves approximating the adapter parameter matrix with multiple low-rank dense matrices and a dense matrix block to reduce the number of parameters, making it suitable for execution on hardware accelerators and reducing computational resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If adapter parameter matrices are used for neural network adaptation, then the neural network can be adapted to various machine learning tasks, but the computational resource consumption and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural network adaptation capabilityVSAvoidcomputational resource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The adapter parameter matrix is segmented into multiple smaller low-rank dense matrices and a dense matrix block. This segmentation reduces the computational burden by breaking down the large matrix into manageable components that can be processed more efficiently on hardware accelerators while preserving the adaptation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter representation from a full-rank adapter parameter matrix to a low-rank approximation composed of multiple smaller matrices and a dense matrix block. This parameter transformation maintains the essential adaptation functionality while significantly reducing the number of parameters and computational operations required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If full-rank adapter parameter matrices are used, then the neural network maintains high expressiveness, but the memory footprint and computational operations increase from Θ(n²) to Θ(ns+nb)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidnumber of parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transforms the parameter structure from a full-rank n×n adapter parameter matrix to a low-rank approximation using multiple smaller matrices of size n×s and n×b. This parameter transformation reduces the total number of parameters from n² to ns+nb, significantly decreasing memory footprint while maintaining model performance through the low-rank structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses multiple smaller low-rank dense matrices and a dense matrix block to collectively represent the adapter parameter matrix. This approach creates a simplified copy or approximation of the original full-rank matrix that captures the essential information with fewer parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Quantity of substance

If sparse matrices are used for adaptation, then the parameter count is reduced, but hardware utilization rate and efficiency on hardware accelerators decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter countVSAvoidhardware efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the matrix structure from sparse to low-rank dense format. By representing the adapter parameters as multiple low-rank dense matrices and a dense matrix block, the invention maintains high hardware utilization rates on accelerators like GPUs and FPGAs while still reducing the total parameter count compared to full-rank dense matrices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite structure combining multiple low-rank dense matrices and a dense matrix block. This composite approach leverages the strengths of different matrix types to achieve both parameter reduction and hardware efficiency, optimizing for the specific capabilities of hardware accelerators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20250252309A1Hardware-friendly and parameter-efficient tuning of neural networks
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US20250252309A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252309A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252309A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for training a neural network. One of the methods includes obtaining data specifying a trained neural network that includes a plurality of layers that include a particular layer; generating an adapted neural network, comprising generating, for the particular layer, an approximation of an adapter parameter matrix that includes fewer parameters than the adapter parameter matrix; and training the adapted neural network on a machine learning task, wherein the adapting comprises learning fine-tuned values of parameters of the approximation using training data while holding the trained values in the base parameter matrix fixed.