Neural Network for Distinguishing Anatomical Structures in Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer-assisted systems struggle to accurately detect and distinguish critical anatomical structures in dynamic and unpredictable surgical environments, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, due to challenges in processing extended fields of view and handling occluded parts.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a neural network with two configurations to detect and identify anatomical structures in a video of a laparoscopic surgical procedure. The first configuration detects a plurality of structures, while the second configuration, using temporal models and weak labels, identifies specific types of anatomical structures, such as the cystic artery and cystic duct, and generates an augmented video with annotations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If computer-assisted systems process extended field of view in surgical procedures, then the information available to surgeons is improved, but the ability to accurately detect and distinguish critical structures deteriorates due to environmental variability and occlusions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation availabilityVSAvoidstructure detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex surgical environment into multiple processing streams: one for detecting all structures in the extended field of view, and another for specifically identifying critical anatomical structures. This segmentation allows the system to handle the large volume of visual information while maintaining precision in identifying critical elements like vessels and ducts, even when occluded or in variable lighting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from 2D video feed analysis to 3D spatial understanding by implementing depth estimation and spatial relationship analysis. This dimensional enhancement allows the system to distinguish critical structures from background elements more effectively, resolving the contradiction between processing extended field of view and maintaining detection accuracy in variable surgical environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If the neural network uses a single configuration to detect all structures, then the system complexity is reduced, but the ability to distinguish specific types of anatomical structures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidanatomical structure identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic configuration switching of the neural network based on the surgical phase and detected structures. The network adapts its parameters and focus during the procedure, transitioning from a general detection mode to a specialized identification mode for critical structures. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain high identification accuracy without requiring permanently complex multi-configuration systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of all structures in the surgical field before focusing on specific anatomical identification. This two-stage approach allows the simpler initial detection phase to guide the subsequent more complex identification phase, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high accuracy in distinguishing specific anatomical structures like cystic arteries and common bile ducts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If the system annotates all detected structures, then the completeness of information is improved, but the visual clutter and difficulty in identifying critical structures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidvisual interpretation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different annotation qualities and levels of detail to different types of structures based on their clinical significance. Critical anatomical structures receive prominent, distinct annotations with higher visual weight, while less critical structures receive simpler or no annotations. This local differentiation maintains information completeness while ensuring that critical structures stand out clearly to the surgeon, improving visual interpretation ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and highlights only the most critical anatomical structures for prominent display, separating them from the complete set of detected structures. This extraction approach maintains full information availability in the system's internal representation while presenting a simplified, clutter-free view to the surgeon that focuses attention on critical elements needing identification or avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250143806A1Detecting and distinguishing critical structures in surgical procedures using machine learning
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 DIGITAL SURGERY LTD
  • US20250143806A1 patent drawing
  • US20250143806A1 patent drawing
  • US20250143806A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technical solutions are provided to facilitate computer assistance during a surgery to prevent complications by detecting, identifying, and highlighting specific anatomical structures in a video of the surgery using machine learning. According to some aspects, a computer vision system is trained to detect several structures in the video of the surgery, and further to distinguish between the structures despite their similar appearance.