Neural Network Attribution for Biological Mechanism Interpretation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine-learning models for predicting biological responses, such as treatment efficacy, often result in 'black box' models that lack interpretability, failing to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A neural network-based modeling framework that integrates recursive feature elimination and scoring, allowing for the identification of key biological inputs and elucidation of underlying mechanisms, thereby providing target deconvolution and improving model interpretability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning models are used to predict biological responses, then prediction accuracy is improved, but model interpretability deteriorates resulting in black box models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The model output is segmented into two distinct components: prediction results and attribution scores. The attribution mechanism divides the black box model into interpretable parts by calculating the contribution of each input feature to the final prediction, allowing users to understand which biological inputs drive the predicted response without sacrificing prediction accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An attribution mechanism serves as an intermediary layer between the neural network and the user. This intermediary computes attribution scores that translate the internal workings of the black box model into interpretable information about biological mechanisms, enabling both accurate prediction and mechanistic insight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If complex neural networks are used to model biological systems, then predictive power is improved, but understanding of underlying mechanisms deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive powerVSAvoidmechanism understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The attribution mechanism provides feedback about the biological mechanisms underlying predictions. By calculating and reporting attribution scores for each input feature, the system feeds back information about which biological pathways and molecules contribute most to the predicted response, enabling researchers to understand and validate the biological plausibility of predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The attribution mechanism acts as a mediator that translates complex neural network computations into biologically interpretable information. It bridges the gap between the black box predictive model and human understanding of biological mechanisms by providing attribution scores that highlight key drivers of the prediction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250166723A1Machine learning applications to predict biological outcomes and elucidate underlying biological mechanisms
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENT
  • US20250166723A1 patent drawing
  • US20250166723A1 patent drawing
  • US20250166723A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for modeling highly complex biological relations in machine-learned models, such as neural networks (e.g., such as deep neural networks (DNNs)), to predict biological outcomes and elucidate underlying mechanisms are described. The systems and methods utilize recursive feature elimination and scoring and can be utilized to prioritize particular compounds or treatments for clinical development and direct new avenues of research and development based on elucidated mechanisms.