Neural Network Brittleness Scoring for Faster Task Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in efficiently organizing and utilizing existing models due to model brittleness, leading to inefficient training and inability to leverage information for improving model performance, especially when adapting models for new tasks.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for identifying and improving model brittleness by determining brittleness scores of preliminary and reference models, comparing them, and generating a preferred model based on the comparison, using a combination of hardware and software, including model optimizers and cloud services for ephemeral container instances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If models are trained extensively to improve performance on new tasks, then model accuracy improves, but training time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by computing brittleness scores and identifying suitable reference models before actual training begins. This advance preparation allows the system to leverage pre-computed metrics and existing model knowledge, reducing the time and resources needed for full model training while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a reference model that copies and stores performance characteristics from previously trained models. By copying relevant information about model behavior and performance across different tasks, the system avoids retraining from scratch and can quickly adapt to new tasks using the copied knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If organizations train many models for different tasks, then task coverage improves, but organizational complexity and resource management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask coverageVSAvoidorganizational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal reference model that serves multiple functions across different tasks. Instead of maintaining separate models for each task, the reference model provides a unified approach that can be applied universally to evaluate and adapt models for various tasks, reducing organizational complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from managing multiple complete models to managing a single reference model with computed brittleness scores and performance metrics. By changing the parameters from full model instances to condensed performance characteristics, the system reduces complexity while maintaining the ability to cover multiple tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional training methods are used without model brittleness assessment, then training process is simple, but model performance on new tasks deteriorates due to brittleness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining process simplicityVSAvoidmodel performance on new tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces feedback by computing brittleness scores that measure how well a model performs across different tasks. This feedback mechanism identifies models that are prone to brittleness before they are deployed, allowing the system to select or adjust models to improve performance on new tasks while maintaining relative simplicity in the training process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If existing models are not evaluated for brittleness, then model selection is fast, but model performance deteriorates due to selecting brittle models for new tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel selection speedVSAvoidmodel performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of model brittleness by computing brittleness scores in advance. This preliminary action stores performance characteristics that can be quickly queried during model selection, maintaining fast selection speed while ensuring that non-brittle models are chosen for new tasks, thereby improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250238288A1Systems and methods to identify neural network brittleness based on sample data and seed generation
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20250238288A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238288A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238288A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for determining neural network brittleness are disclosed. For example, the system may include one or more memory units storing instructions and one or more processors configured to execute the instructions to perform operations. The operations may include receiving a modeling request comprising a preliminary model and a dataset. The operations may include determining a preliminary brittleness score of the preliminary model. The operations may include identifying a reference model and determining a reference brittleness score of the reference model. The operations may include comparing the preliminary brittleness score to the reference brittleness score and generating a preferred model based on the comparison. The operations may include providing the preferred model.