Neural Network Completion Equipment Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for selecting completion equipment for wellbores are time-consuming and costly, as they often require trial and error, and lack efficiency in identifying the most suitable equipment for specific wellbore conditions.

Innovation Solution

A neural network system that processes data on wellbore characteristics to determine the likelihood of success for different types of completion equipment, allowing for automated or assisted selection of the most suitable equipment based on quality metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional trial and error methods are used to select completion equipment, then equipment selection can be made, but the process is time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment selection accuracyVSAvoidequipment selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by training a neural network model on historical wellbore data and completion equipment performance before actual equipment selection is needed. This pre-computed knowledge base enables rapid equipment selection without trial-and-error during the actual selection process, resolving the contradiction between selection accuracy and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical trial-and-error process with an intelligent information processing system. A neural network model processes wellbore characteristics and historical data to predict optimal completion equipment, substituting physical experimentation with computational analysis, thereby eliminating time loss while maintaining or improving selection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If multiple types of completion equipment are tested through trial and error, then the most suitable equipment can be identified, but the process becomes costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment suitabilityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation by analyzing historical performance data of multiple equipment types across similar wellbores before deployment. The neural network predicts which equipment types are most suitable based on matched characteristics, eliminating the need for costly trial-and-error testing of multiple equipment types in the actual wellbore.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses historical wellbore data and performance records as copies of real-world scenarios to train the neural network model. This virtual copying of past experiences allows the system to learn optimal equipment selections without physically testing equipment in each new wellbore, reducing costs while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If conventional methods are used to select completion equipment, then equipment can be deployed, but efficiency in resource extraction is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource extraction efficiencyVSAvoidwell construction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization by identifying the most suitable completion equipment before well construction begins. By pre-analyzing wellbore characteristics and predicting optimal equipment performance, the system eliminates delays associated with trial-and-error equipment testing during construction, thereby improving both construction speed and eventual resource extraction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network model incorporates feedback from historical wellbore performance data to continuously improve equipment selection accuracy. This learned feedback mechanism enables the system to predict which equipment configurations will maximize resource extraction efficiency for specific wellbore types, avoiding inefficient equipment choices that would waste time during construction and operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11599955B2Systems and methods for evaluating and selecting completion equipment using a neural network
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US11599955B2 patent drawing
  • US11599955B2 patent drawing
  • US11599955B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example method, a system obtains first data indicating a plurality of properties of a wellbore, and determines a plurality of types of completion equipment available for deployment at the wellbore. Further, the system determines, using a computerized neural network, a plurality of quality metrics based on the first data. Each of the quality metrics represents an estimated likelihood of success of operating a respective one of the types of completion equipment at the wellbore. Further, the system causes a graphical user interface to be displayed to a user. The graphical user interface includes a concurrent presentation of an indication of each of the types of completion equipment, and an indication of each of the quality metrics.