Neural Network Configuration Scoring for Computing Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating computing devices are time-consuming and inadequate for quickly assessing specific functions, such as storage capacity, as they primarily focus on computing power, delaying product shipment and requiring extensive preparation and testing.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device and method using a neural network model with cluster centers to estimate device configuration scores based on feature values, allowing for rapid calculation and generation of reference configurations tailored to specific user requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If test software is used to evaluate computing devices, then evaluation accuracy is improved, but testing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores configuration scores for various device configurations in a database before actual testing occurs. When a testing request comes in, the system directly retrieves pre-computed scores instead of performing time-consuming tests, thus maintaining evaluation accuracy while dramatically reducing testing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the testing process by using machine learning models to predict test results based on device configuration parameters. Instead of physically executing tests on each device, the system generates predicted test results that mirror what actual tests would produce, eliminating the need for time-consuming physical testing while preserving evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If comprehensive test software is used to evaluate all functions, then evaluation completeness is improved, but inability to quickly assess specific functions worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation completenessVSAvoidassessment speed for specific functions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process by creating separate machine learning models for different device functions (e.g., display, processor, memory, camera). Each model is trained on specific function-related data and can independently evaluate that function, allowing the system to provide comprehensive evaluation across all functions while quickly assessing specific functions by activating only the relevant model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different evaluation qualities to different functions by training specialized machine learning models for each device component. Each model has local expertise in evaluating its specific function, enabling the system to maintain comprehensive evaluation capability while providing fast, specialized assessment for any specific function requested by the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If manual preparation and assembly processes are used, then device quality control is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice quality controlVSAvoidproduct shipment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical preparation and assembly processes with automated machine learning-based configuration scoring systems. Instead of human operators manually testing and evaluating each device configuration, the system automatically retrieves pre-computed scores from databases or generates predictions using trained models, maintaining quality control through consistent evaluation criteria while dramatically increasing productivity by eliminating manual labor bottlenecks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12141693B2Electronic device and method for generating reference configuration of computing device
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 WIWYNN CORP
  • US12141693B2 patent drawing
  • US12141693B2 patent drawing
  • US12141693B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic device and a method for generating a reference configuration of a computing device are provided. The method includes: obtaining a first neural network model, wherein the first neural network model includes a plurality of cluster centers, wherein the plurality of cluster centers correspond to a plurality of features; obtaining a first configuration requirement; determining that the first configuration requirement corresponding to a first cluster center among the plurality of cluster centers; generating the reference configuration according to a plurality of first feature values of the first cluster center, wherein the plurality of first feature values correspond to the plurality of features, respectively; and outputting the reference configuration.