Neural Network Correction of Medical Projection Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing correction algorithms for medical projection data are time-consuming, leading to suboptimal image quality and diagnostic accuracy due to artifacts and noise in reconstructed images.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a neural network model to determine correction coefficients and noise reduction parameters, trained using sample data and scanning parameters to correct projection data efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing correction algorithms are used to correct projection data, then correction accuracy can be achieved, but processing time becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training neural network models with large amounts of projection data and correction parameters before actual use. The neural network learns optimal correction strategies during the training phase, so that during actual correction operations, the pre-learned knowledge can be rapidly applied without requiring time-consuming iterative calculations, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical correction algorithms (which rely on iterative mathematical computations) with a neural network-based system. The neural network, after being trained with sufficient data, can perform corrections in a single pass without requiring repeated iterative calculations, thereby dramatically reducing processing time while maintaining correction accuracy through the learned patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If traditional correction methods are applied, then projection data can be corrected, but image quality remains suboptimal due to artifacts and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcorrection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by training the neural network to learn optimal correction parameters (such as correction coefficients and weighting factors) from training data. Instead of using fixed or manually tuned parameters, the neural network dynamically determines the best parameters based on the input projection data characteristics, thereby improving image quality while maintaining high correction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network performs self-service by automatically learning correction strategies from training data without requiring manual intervention or iterative adjustment during the correction process. The model self-optimizes its parameters during training and then autonomously applies corrections to new data, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual parameter tuning and improving both image quality and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If complex correction algorithms are used to reduce artifacts and noise, then image quality improves, but processing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical correction algorithms with a neural network system. Although the neural network training process is complex, the actual correction operation becomes simple and fast once trained. The neural network encapsulates the complex correction logic within its trained weights and biases, allowing simple forward propagation to achieve high-quality corrections without requiring complex runtime computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing the complex algorithmic work during the offline training phase rather than during online correction operations. The neural network learns complex correction patterns from training data, and this pre-learned knowledge is then applied efficiently during actual use, separating the complexity of learning from the simplicity of application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11908046B2Systems and methods for determining processing parameter for medical image processing
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 SHANGHAI UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE
  • US11908046B2 patent drawing
  • US11908046B2 patent drawing
  • US11908046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for determine a parameter for medical data processing are provided. The method may include obtaining sample data, the sample data may comprise at least one of projection data or a scanning parameter. The method may also include obtaining a first neural network model. The method may further include determining the parameter based on the sample data and the first neural network model. The parameter may comprise at least one of a correction coefficient or a noise reduction parameter.