Neural Network CUDA Streams for Parallel Pipeline Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing application programming interfaces for executing neural networks can result in inefficient code due to their complexity, leading to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

An application programming interface that utilizes CUDA execution streams to optimize the execution of neural networks by subdividing operations into concurrent streams, leveraging techniques such as loop fusion, loop unrolling, data-flow analysis, and parallelization, and synchronizing basic blocks to improve performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional APIs are used to execute neural networks, then the implementation is straightforward, but the execution efficiency is suboptimal due to code complexity and lack of parallelization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution efficiencyVSAvoidcode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the neural network execution into multiple independent CUDA streams, where each stream handles specific operations (e.g., stream 0 for weight bias loading, stream 1 for activation computations, stream 2 for output computations). This segmentation enables parallel execution of otherwise sequential operations, improving execution efficiency while managing complexity through structured stream organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the dimension of parallel execution streams to transform the traditionally sequential neural network execution into concurrent operations. By adding the stream dimension, operations that were previously executed one after another can now proceed simultaneously across multiple streams, fundamentally changing the execution model from sequential to parallel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If operations are executed sequentially in a single stream, then the code is simpler to implement, but the execution time increases due to lack of overlapping memory copies and kernel executions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution timeVSAvoidease of implementation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-loading weights and biases into device memory before the main computation begins. This preliminary data preparation in stream 0 allows subsequent computation streams to proceed without waiting for memory transfers, reducing execution time by overlapping data preparation with computation in other streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuity of useful action by maintaining multiple active CUDA streams that execute computations continuously without idle waiting periods. While one stream is performing kernel computations, other streams simultaneously perform memory copies or preparatory operations, eliminating gaps in useful work and reducing overall execution time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If multiple CUDA streams are used for parallel execution, then the execution efficiency improves through overlapping operations, but the synchronization and management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution efficiencyVSAvoidstream management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through synchronization points where streams wait for dependencies to be resolved before proceeding. This feedback-based synchronization ensures that streams coordinate their execution based on actual completion status of dependent operations, maintaining correctness while enabling parallel execution. The synchronization acts as feedback that regulates the flow between streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If loop fusion and unrolling techniques are applied, then the execution performance improves through better data reuse and reduced overhead, but the code complexity and memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution performanceVSAvoidmemory requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies loop fusion by merging multiple sequential operations into single fused kernels where possible. This merging allows intermediate results to be reused without writing back to memory, improving data reuse and execution performance. The fused operations are executed in-stream, reducing memory traffic while maintaining the benefits of parallel stream execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12443831B1Neural network execution streams
Publication Date: 2025.10.14 NVIDIA CORP
  • US12443831B1 patent drawing
  • US12443831B1 patent drawing
  • US12443831B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, and techniques to perform a neural network. In at least one embodiment, an application programming interface schedules two or more graph nodes to be performed by two or more parallel processing pipelines based, at least in part, on an order of layers in the neural network.