Seamless Data Transfer via Neural Network Protocol Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data transfer systems face interruptions and inefficiencies due to dynamic network parameter fluctuations and device constraints, leading to network overload, power consumption issues, and data loss, especially when users move out of wireless coverage areas or exceed data plan limits.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that monitor network parameters and power in real-time, determine optimal communication protocols using neural networks, split and sequence data for seamless transfer, and switch protocols as needed to maintain continuous data transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If wireless protocols are used for data transfer, then data can be transferred between communication devices, but network parameter fluctuations cause interruptions and data loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer continuityVSAvoiddata transfer reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between multiple communication protocols (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, cellular) based on real-time network conditions, device state, and data characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain continuous data transfer even when one protocol becomes unavailable or unreliable, resolving the contradiction between transfer continuity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes communication parameters by selecting different protocols and adjusting transmission settings based on monitored network conditions. When network parameters fluctuate beyond threshold values, the system transitions to alternative protocols with different characteristics, maintaining reliable data transfer despite changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If short-range wireless protocol like Bluetooth is used, then power consumption is reduced, but data transfer is terminated when users move out of coverage area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidtransmission range adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements multi-functionality by supporting multiple communication protocols (Bluetooth for short-range low-power transfer, Wi-Fi for medium-range, cellular for long-range). The system can universally handle data transfer across different ranges and power requirements by selecting the appropriate protocol, resolving the contradiction between power efficiency and range adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically transitions between communication protocols based on the user's movement and network availability. When Bluetooth coverage is lost, the system automatically switches to Wi-Fi or cellular protocols to maintain connectivity, allowing the system to adapt to changing transmission range requirements while managing power consumption efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If high-power wireless protocol like Wi-Fi is used for large data transfer, then transfer speed is improved, but data transfer fails due to power constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the data transfer process by dividing large data transfers into smaller packets that can be transmitted using lower-power protocols like Bluetooth. This segmentation allows the system to achieve acceptable overall transfer speeds while consuming less power, resolving the contradiction between transfer speed and power consumption for large data sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes transmission parameters by selecting protocols and settings appropriate to the data size and remaining battery power. For large data transfers with limited power, the system may use lower-power protocols with adjusted transmission parameters or split transfers across multiple protocols, balancing speed requirements with power constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If data transfer is retransmitted after interruption, then data completeness is restored, but network overload occurs and bandwidth is wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer completenessVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by monitoring network conditions and proactively switching protocols before data transfer interruptions occur. By detecting deteriorating network parameters and transitioning to alternative protocols in advance, the system prevents data loss and eliminates the need for retransmission, maintaining reliability while avoiding network overload and bandwidth waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring network parameters and adjusting protocol selection based on real-time conditions. This feedback loop allows the system to respond to network changes dynamically, ensuring complete data transfer without unnecessary retransmissions and optimizing network bandwidth utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

5Reliability

If protocol switching is implemented to maintain continuous transfer, then data transfer reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer reliabilityVSAvoidprotocol management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary protocol selection layer that manages transitions between different communication protocols. This intermediary mechanism automatically monitors conditions and handles protocol switching based on pre-defined criteria and thresholds, reducing the complexity burden on the core data transfer logic while maintaining high reliability through intelligent protocol management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11206191B2Method and system for providing seamless data transfer between communication devices
Publication Date: 2021.12.21 WIPRO LTD
  • US11206191B2 patent drawing
  • US11206191B2 patent drawing
  • US11206191B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a method and a data transfer system for providing seamless data transfer between communication devices. Properties of data to be transferred, status of network parameters and power associated with the communication devices are monitored in real time. Further, communication protocols available at the communication devices and a need to switch between the communication protocols are determined. Splitting of the data into subsets of data and sequencing the subsets of data are performed using a neural network, which is trained based on properties of the data, data storage space of the communication devices, speed of data transfer and a communication channel available for the data transfer. The optimum communication protocols are identified based on order of priority value and contention value. The subsets of data are transferred using identified optimum communication protocols, until a change in the monitored status is detected to switch the optimum communication protocols.