Automated Neural Network Optimization via Asynchronous Evolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing neural networks is challenging due to diverse topologies and numerous parameters, often relying on handpicked hyperparameters, guesswork, or intuition, leading to time-consuming and happenstance successes.

Innovation Solution

An automated asynchronous evolutionary process using genetic algorithms to generate and optimize deep neural networks by encoding layer types and parameters in digital genes, allowing parallel processing on large-scale platforms to determine optimal network configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If handpicked and hand-tuned hyperparameters are used, then neural network performance can be optimized, but the design process becomes time-consuming and relies on guesswork and intuition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural network performanceVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing neural networks to automatically optimize their own hyperparameters through evolutionary algorithms. The networks compete in tournaments where they are evaluated on performance, and the winning configurations are automatically selected and refined without human intervention, eliminating the need for manual hyperparameter tuning while maintaining or improving performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-training multiple neural network populations with diverse hyperparameter configurations before the final selection process. This preliminary evolutionary training explores the hyperparameter space in advance, identifying promising configurations that can then be rapidly evaluated and selected for specific tasks, significantly reducing the time required for final optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If diverse topologies and parameters are explored, then optimal network configurations can be found, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimal configurationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the population into multiple independent sub-populations, each exploring different regions of the topology and parameter space. This segmentation allows parallel exploration of diverse configurations without requiring a single enormous computational resource, distributing the complexity across manageable independent groups that can be processed simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions to another dimension by implementing evolutionary algorithms that operate in the space of network architectures themselves, rather than merely adjusting weights. This adds a dimensional layer of optimization where entire network topologies evolve and compete, enabling exploration of diverse configurations through genetic operations like crossover and mutation applied to architectural blueprints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If automated evolutionary processes are used, then hyperparameter optimization becomes efficient and systematic, but the initial setup and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by training multiple populations with varying degrees of hyperparameter diversity and complexity simultaneously. Not all populations explore the entire parameter space with equal depth - some focus on specific architectures while others explore broader ranges. This partial exploration across multiple groups achieves comprehensive coverage more efficiently than exhaustive search of all possibilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements parameter changes by dynamically adjusting evolutionary parameters such as mutation rates, population sizes, and selection pressures during the optimization process. These parameter changes allow the system to adapt computational resource allocation based on progress, intensifying exploration when needed and exploiting successful configurations when found, thereby improving efficiency while managing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11429865B1Optimizing neural networks
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 UT BATTELLE LLC
  • US11429865B1 patent drawing
  • US11429865B1 patent drawing
  • US11429865B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method design and optimize neural networks. The system and method include a data store that stores a plurality of gene vectors that represent diverse and distinct neural networks and an evaluation queue stored with the plurality of gene vectors. Secondary nodes construct, train, and evaluate the neural network and automatically render a plurality of fitness values asynchronously. A primary node executes a gene amplification on a select plurality of gene vectors, a crossing-over of the amplified gene vectors, and a mutation of the crossing-over gene vectors automatically and asynchronously, which are then transmitted to the evaluation queue. The process continuously repeats itself by processing the gene vectors inserted into the evaluation queue until a fitness level is reached, a network's accuracy level plateaus, a processing time period expires, or when some stopping condition or performance metric is met or exceeded.