Neural Network Experimental Condition Optimizer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for optimizing experimental conditions in synthetic experiments using neural networks are inefficient, requiring numerous experiments and lacking a systematic approach to achieve high yields.

Innovation Solution

A neural network-based method that receives structural information of reactants and products, generates experimental condition combinations, calculates prediction yields and accuracy, determines experiment priorities, and updates the prediction model based on experimental results to optimize conditions effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional methods are used to optimize experimental conditions, then comprehensive experimentation can be performed, but the number of experiments required is large and efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexperiment efficiencyVSAvoidtime for experimentation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using a neural network to predict optimal experimental conditions before actual experiments are conducted. The system pre-calculates priority rankings for multiple experimental condition combinations based on predicted yield and accuracy, allowing researchers to systematically select the most promising conditions to test first, thereby reducing the overall number of experiments needed and accelerating the optimization process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by transforming the experimental optimization problem into a computational prediction task. The neural network model processes structural information of reactants and products to generate predictions about yield and accuracy under different experimental conditions. By changing from direct trial-and-error experimentation to computational parameter prediction, the system achieves higher productivity while reducing time loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If more experiments are conducted to improve yield, then better results can be achieved, but the cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct yieldVSAvoidnumber of experiments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by creating a virtual model (neural network) that replicates the behavior of the actual chemical reaction system. Instead of conducting numerous physical experiments to determine optimal yield, the system uses the trained neural network model to copy and simulate experimental outcomes under various conditions. This virtual copying allows reliable prediction of high-yield conditions without requiring proportional increases in actual experimentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical system of physical experimentation with an information-processing system. The neural network replaces the need for repeated physical trials by computationally predicting which experimental conditions will produce high yields. This substitution maintains reliability in achieving desired yield outcomes while dramatically reducing the quantity of experiments required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If experimental conditions are optimized without systematic approach, then random trials can be performed, but the ability to achieve high yield efficiently is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of optimizationVSAvoidoptimization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the neural network model to continuously evaluate and rank experimental condition combinations based on predicted yield and accuracy. The system provides structured feedback in the form of priority rankings that guide which conditions should be tested next. This feedback mechanism ensures that optimization proceeds systematically toward high-yield solutions with high precision, while maintaining fast productivity through efficient condition selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the overall optimization process into distinct computational stages: (1) generating multiple experimental condition combinations, (2) predicting yield and accuracy for each combination using the neural network, (3) ranking combinations by priority, and (4) selecting top conditions for actual experimentation. This segmentation enables systematic optimization with high precision while maintaining rapid productivity through parallel evaluation of multiple conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11720791B2Apparatus and method of optimizing experimental conditions using neural network
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11720791B2 patent drawing
  • US11720791B2 patent drawing
  • US11720791B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for optimizing experimental conditions by using a neural network may calculate a prediction yield and accuracy of the prediction yield by using a neural network-based experimental prediction model. The apparatus may optimize the experimental conditions by determining an experiment priority of a respective experiment condition combination based on the prediction yield and the prediction accuracy and receiving a feedback of results of experiments performed according to the experiment priority.