Neural Network Analysis of Network Fabric Design Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern network fabric designs are complex and difficult to assess for quality, reliability, efficiency, and expandability before deployment, often leading to issues such as single points of failure or inefficient resource utilization, which can only be identified after implementation.

Innovation Solution

A neural network-based system that analyzes network fabric designs by converting wiring diagrams into multigraphs, generating adjacency and degree matrices, and creating feature matrices to predict the quality of the design, providing a score and identifying potential issues before deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual, rule-based analysis is used to assess network fabric design quality, then the analysis can be performed with simple tools, but the process is time-consuming and cannot scale effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual, rule-based analysis mechanisms with an automated neural network system. The neural network model processes wiring diagrams and generates quality assessments automatically, eliminating the need for manual evaluation while providing scalable analysis capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service analysis where the neural network autonomously evaluates network fabric designs without requiring manual intervention. The automated system performs quality assessment, identifies issues, and provides recommendations independently, improving productivity while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive quality assessment is performed manually, then detailed analysis of reliability, efficiency, and expandability can be conducted, but the process becomes time-consuming and impractical for large networks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign quality assessmentVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network performs comprehensive quality assessment in advance during the design phase, before the network is deployed. By conducting thorough analysis of reliability, efficiency, and expandability beforehand, the system identifies issues early when correction is most effective, eliminating the need for time-consuming post-implementation reviews.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes manual comprehensive analysis with an automated neural network that can rapidly evaluate multiple aspects of network quality simultaneously. This mechanical substitution enables detailed assessment of reliability, efficiency, and expandability without the time penalty associated with manual review processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If neural network-based automated analysis is implemented, then analysis speed and scalability improve, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis throughputVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer in the form of a neural network model that sits between the wiring diagram input and the quality assessment output. This intermediary processes the complex relationships in network fabrics automatically, enabling high throughput analysis while managing system complexity through the standardized neural network architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a trained neural network model that captures complex patterns from previously analyzed networks. By copying the knowledge embedded in the trained model, the system can rapidly assess new network designs without requiring complex real-time computations, thus improving throughput while managing architectural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If detailed feature extraction and matrix generation are performed, then the accuracy of quality prediction improves, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms network fabric characteristics into specific mathematical parameters through feature extraction and matrix generation. By converting complex network properties into standardized parameters (adjacency matrices, degree matrices, feature vectors), the system achieves high prediction accuracy while enabling efficient processing through the structured parameter representation that the neural network can process systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230351077A1Automated analysis of an infrastructure deployment design
Publication Date: 2023.11.02 DELL PROD LP
  • US20230351077A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351077A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351077A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A design of an infrastructure deployment is used for new deployments or as part of an addition to an existing deployment. Because of the complexity of modern infrastructure deployment designs, these designs are subject to a number of problems that are too complex and extensive for manual detection of potential issues. Furthermore, these infrastructure deployments are often critical infrastructure, which means their timely deployment and proper functioning are necessary. While improper design can cause functional problems, selection of an infrastructure element that suffers a supply chain delay so as to delay deployment can be as negatively impactful as a poor design. Accordingly, embodiments herein help automate the analysis of an infrastructure deployment design. In one or more embodiments, a trained neural network receives as input a design and analyzes it to classify a particular issue or issues of the design.