Neural Network Image Reconstruction Quality Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image reconstruction methods require significant time and labor to achieve high-quality images, as they often rely on suboptimal weighting of regularization and data fidelity terms, leading to noisy or blurry results when applied across different tissues or phases, necessitating multiple reconstructions and operator intervention.

Innovation Solution

A machine-trained neural network assigns quality scores to images during the reconstruction process, allowing for automated assessment and optimization of image quality, providing exit criteria and enabling rapid identification of the highest quality reconstruction without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If multiple differently-regularized reconstructions are performed for each tissue type or phase to achieve highest quality, then image quality is improved, but time and processing cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidreconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically selecting regularization parameters and weighting factors based on tissue type and imaging phase without requiring operator intervention. The neural network autonomously determines optimal reconstruction parameters for each image, eliminating the need for manual trial-and-error across multiple reconstructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts regularization parameters and weighting factors based on detected tissue characteristics and imaging phase. By changing these parameters adaptively rather than using fixed values, the system achieves high image quality across diverse tissues and phases without requiring multiple manual reconstructions with different parameter sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If operator selection among multiple reconstructions is implemented to ensure highest quality, then image quality is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to increased complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously identifies and selects the optimal reconstruction parameters and weighting factors based on tissue type and imaging phase characteristics. This self-service capability eliminates the need for operators to manually review and select among multiple reconstructions, simplifying the workflow while maintaining high image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that use image quality metrics and tissue characterization to automatically adjust reconstruction parameters. This closed-loop approach ensures optimal image quality is achieved without requiring operator intervention to evaluate and select among multiple reconstruction options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If weights from one tissue type reconstruction are applied to another tissue type, then productivity is improved by reducing processing, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to suboptimal image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconstruction efficiencyVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies tissue-specific regularization parameters and weighting factors tailored to each tissue type and imaging phase. By using local optimization rather than global parameter sets, the system ensures high image quality for each specific tissue type while maintaining efficient processing through automated parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes regularization parameters and weighting factors based on the specific tissue type and imaging phase being reconstructed. This adaptive parameter adjustment ensures optimal image quality for each tissue type without requiring manual reconfiguration, achieving both high productivity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10832451B2Machine learning in iterative image reconstruction
Publication Date: 2020.11.10 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US10832451B2 patent drawing
  • US10832451B2 patent drawing
  • US10832451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In order to reduce the time and effort required to generate high-quality image reconstructions, a machine-trained neural network may assign a quality score to an image at each iteration of a reconstruction. The neural network may confirm that the iterative reconstruction process increases image quality as each iteration converges to the solution of an optimization problem. The image quality score generated by the neural network may drive the reconstruction toward better image quality by contributing to a regularization term of a cost function minimized by the optimization problem. The neural network may allow for multiple reconstruction of image data to be performed rapidly and for the highest image quality reconstruction to be identified. Additionally, the neural network may provide exit criteria of the iterative reconstruction or may contribute to the optimization problem.