Neural networks to identify chemicals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer-aided drug design techniques often fail to accurately predict the interactions between proteins and pharmaceutical drugs due to the complexity of physicochemical interactions, leading to ineffective or impractical drug candidates.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing a neural network-based system that iteratively updates candidate ligands by predicting their interactions with proteins and synthesizability, incorporating feedback loops to refine the identification of ligands that effectively bind and modify protein activities and properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional computer-aided drug design techniques are used to calculate physicochemical interactions in isolation, then computational resources are saved, but the accuracy of drug candidate identification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of interaction predictionVSAvoidcomplexity of computational system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex drug discovery process into multiple specialized neural network models, each handling specific tasks such as protein folding prediction, ligand binding affinity prediction, and molecular generation. This segmentation allows each model to focus on specific physicochemical interactions without needing to model all interactions simultaneously, thereby improving prediction accuracy while managing computational complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces neural network models as intermediary components between the protein structure and drug candidate evaluation. These neural networks serve as mediators that predict complex physicochemical interactions without requiring direct calculation of all atomic-level interactions, thus improving prediction accuracy while reducing the computational burden of modeling every interaction explicitly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive physicochemical interactions are considered, then the accuracy of drug candidate identification is improved, but computational resources and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of drug candidate predictionVSAvoidtime for computational processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs preliminary action by using neural network models to pre-dict protein folding structures and ligand binding affinities before conducting full drug candidate evaluation. This preliminary prediction step filters out unlikely candidates early in the process, allowing comprehensive interaction analysis to be focused only on promising candidates, thereby improving overall prediction accuracy while reducing total computational time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes traditional mechanical computational methods (direct calculation of physicochemical interactions) with neural network-based predictive models. These models learn from training data to predict interaction outcomes without explicitly calculating each interaction, thereby maintaining high prediction accuracy while dramatically reducing computational time and resources required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If multiple neural network models are used to predict interactions, then the quality of ligand identification is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of ligand binding predictionVSAvoidnumber of neural network models
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple specialized neural network models into an integrated end-to-end computational workflow. The models are combined such that outputs from one model serve as inputs to subsequent models, creating a unified system that leverages the strengths of each individual model while presenting a cohesive interface for drug candidate identification, thereby improving reliability without proportionally increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the neural network models to serve multiple functions within the drug discovery pipeline. For example, the same neural network architecture is used for both protein folding prediction and ligand binding affinity prediction, and models can operate in different modes (generation, evaluation, optimization) depending on the specific task, thereby improving prediction reliability across multiple tasks while reducing the total number of distinct models required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250232848A1Neural networks to identify chemicals
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20250232848A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232848A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232848A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, and techniques to identify chemicals. In at least one embodiment, one or more neural networks are used to identify one or more first chemicals based, at least in part, on one or more interactions, predicted by said one or more neural networks, of said one or more first chemicals with one or more second chemicals.