Neural Network Material Testing Change Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current material testing systems require manual monitoring or pre-configured alerts to detect changes during cyclic fatigue tests, which can be time-consuming and inefficient, often requiring foreknowledge of failure indicators and may not detect changes until they reach an obvious level.

Innovation Solution

A material testing system utilizing neural networks, specifically LSTM or CNN models, to detect changes in real-time by training on actual test data and adjusting parameters in response to detected anomalies, with the ability to notify operators and modify test sequences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual monitoring or pre-configured alerts are used to detect changes during material testing, then detection capability is provided, but time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange detection capabilityVSAvoidtime consumption for monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses unsupervised machine learning models that automatically learn from test data and detect changes without human intervention. The model trains on normal test data to establish a baseline, then automatically identifies deviations indicating potential failures, eliminating the need for manual monitoring while maintaining high detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual monitoring mechanisms with an automated computational system using machine learning algorithms. The system substitutes human operators with an intelligent algorithm that continuously analyzes test data, detects anomalies, and triggers alerts automatically, significantly reducing time consumption while improving detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If pre-configured limits are set on known parameters to automatically raise alerts, then automation is achieved, but foreknowledge of failure indicators is required and detection sensitivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic alert capabilityVSAvoidflexibility in detecting unknown failure modes
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic, adaptive thresholds instead of static pre-configured limits. The machine learning model continuously learns from incoming test data and automatically adjusts detection thresholds based on observed patterns, enabling the system to adapt to different failure modes without requiring prior configuration knowledge while maintaining full automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from fixed parameter limits to dynamic parameter adaptation. The system transforms static pre-configured thresholds into adaptive detection criteria that evolve with the test data, allowing the model to detect both known and unknown failure modes by learning characteristic patterns from normal operation and identifying deviations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If traditional monitoring methods are used, then simple system architecture is maintained, but detection accuracy and early warning capability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary machine learning model layer between the raw test data and the detection decision. This unsupervised learning model acts as a mediator that processes test data, learns normal patterns, and identifies anomalies with high precision. The model serves as an intelligent intermediary that enhances detection accuracy without requiring complex manual analysis systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12130262B2Change detection in material testing
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 TA INSTRUMENTS WATERS LLC
  • US12130262B2 patent drawing
  • US12130262B2 patent drawing
  • US12130262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a material testing system that includes a fixture, a frame, a load sensor, a displacement sensor and a computer system coupled to the material testing system. The computer system includes one or more processors, one or more memory devices coupled to the one or more processors, one or more computer readable storage devices coupled to the one or more processors, wherein the one or more storage devices contain program code executable by the one or more processors via the one or more memory devices to implement a method for detecting a change in a material testing sequence. A computer program product that implements a method for detecting a change in a material test sequence, and methods for detecting a change in a material test sequence or fatigue test is further disclosed.