Neural Network Message Translation and Scheduling Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current supply chain management systems face challenges in efficiently translating messages between trading partners due to mismatches in supported message exchange standards, leading to costly, inefficient, and inaccurate communications, and struggle with complex scheduling of shipments involving multiple variables and constraints.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for message translation and optimization that includes a two-factor authentication process, adaptive message translation using configuration sets, and resource scheduling optimization through binary temporal constraint manipulation, enabling efficient and accurate message transmission and scheduling without modifying existing systems or message formats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional sequential constraint checking algorithms are used to optimize shipment scheduling, then the system can process supply chain messages between trading partners, but the processing time becomes excessively long (requiring numerous hours) and the system becomes impractical for real-time operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipment scheduling processing speedVSAvoidtime required to provide shipping solutions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional sequential mechanical constraint-checking algorithms with a neural network-based intelligent system. The neural network learns optimal shipment scheduling solutions through training on historical supply chain data, enabling it to rapidly evaluate multiple constraints (carrier availability, time windows, route optimization) simultaneously without the sequential processing bottlenecks of traditional algorithms, thus achieving real-time optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the shipment scheduling problem from a sequential constraint satisfaction problem into a parallel optimization problem by changing the computational parameters. Instead of checking constraints one by one, the neural network processes multiple constraints in parallel during forward propagation, and the system evaluates numerous scheduling scenarios simultaneously, fundamentally changing the computational approach from sequential to parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If message translation systems modify existing systems or message formats to accommodate different trading partner standards, then communication accuracy improves, but system complexity and implementation cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage translation accuracyVSAvoidsystem modification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a neural network-based translation layer as an intermediary between trading partners with different message standards. This intermediary automatically learns the mapping between various message formats (EDI, XML, JSON, proprietary formats) and internal representations through training, enabling accurate translation without modifying the original trading partner systems or their message formats, thus maintaining simplicity while achieving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual copies of message formats and standards within the neural network's training data and internal representations. By learning from copies of various message standards during training, the system can accurately translate between different formats without requiring actual modifications to the source or destination systems, preserving system integrity while enabling interoperability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If comprehensive constraint validation is performed on all supply chain variables (carriers, time slots, refrigeration, fragile handling, storage), then solution reliability improves, but the computational complexity makes the problem unsolvable within practical timeframes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipment scheduling solution reliabilityVSAvoidconstraint processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training the neural network on extensive supply chain constraint data during an offline phase. The network learns patterns and relationships among multiple constraints (carrier capabilities, time windows, temperature requirements, handling specifications) beforehand, so that during actual shipment scheduling, the pre-trained model can rapidly evaluate new scenarios without performing exhaustive real-time constraint validation, achieving both reliability and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic constraint processing where the neural network adaptively adjusts its evaluation focus based on the specific shipment characteristics and constraint priorities. Rather than rigidly checking all constraints in a fixed sequence, the dynamic system weights and prioritizes constraints based on their relevance to the current scenario, efficiently navigating the constraint space while maintaining solution reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9443229B2Supply chain message management and shipment constraint optimization
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 ELEMICA
  • US9443229B2 patent drawing
  • US9443229B2 patent drawing
  • US9443229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of adapting a message translation system includes receiving a message from a sender; selecting a configuration set from a stored plurality of configuration sets based on at least two of: information regarding the sender of the message, information regarding a recipient of the message, and information regarding the message type; processing the message in accordance with information derived from the selected configuration set; identifying an issue with the processing of the message in accordance with information derived from the selected configuration set; determining a resolution for the identified issue with the processing of the message in accordance with information derived from the selected configuration set; updating the selected configuration set based upon the determined resolution; reprocessing the message in accordance with information derived from the updated configuration set; and transmitting the message reprocessed in accordance with information derived from the updated configuration set to a recipient.