Neural Network Molecule Design via Iterative Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for developing new molecules are limited by reliance on rational design or luck, often optimizing for local maxima and sparsely sampling structure/function spaces, leading to suboptimal results in biomedical applications.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system using neural networks is employed to propose molecules with desired functional properties by training on known molecules, predicting properties, synthesizing candidates, and iteratively refining the training set based on measured properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If rational design or luck-based approaches are used for molecule development, then personal knowledge or sparse sampling is utilized, but the result is optimization towards local maxima with limited functional exploration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolecule design efficiencyVSAvoidfunctional property optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where measured functional properties of synthesized molecules are fed back into the training set, and the neural network is retrained iteratively. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to continuously improve its predictions and escape local maxima by learning from actual experimental results rather than relying on sparse initial sampling or personal knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network performs preliminary action by predicting functional properties of proposed molecules before synthesis. This preliminary evaluation allows the system to identify promising candidates in silico, reducing the need for exhaustive experimental screening and enabling more efficient exploration of the chemical space beyond what rational design or random sampling could achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If sparse sampling of structure/function spaces is used, then immense spaces are searched with limited data, but only one or two functional dimensions are selected when many different functional parameters are critical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional property coverageVSAvoidtraining data volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by using the neural network to predict multiple functional properties simultaneously rather than selecting only one or two dimensions. The network can evaluate numerous functional parameters in parallel, allowing comprehensive exploration of the structure-function landscape without requiring proportional increases in experimental data volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network serves multiple functions: it predicts various functional properties, guides molecule design, and optimizes across multiple dimensions simultaneously. This multi-functional capability allows the system to handle many different functional parameters with a single computational model, rather than requiring separate analyses for each functional dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If iterative training with synthesized molecule data is implemented, then the neural network is retrained with expanded training sets, but time and resources are required for synthesis and measurement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredicted functional property accuracyVSAvoiditeration cycle duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by selecting only the most promising proposed molecules for synthesis based on neural network predictions. Rather than synthesizing and measuring all proposed molecules, the system focuses resources on a subset of high-priority candidates, reducing the time loss per iteration while still achieving meaningful improvements in prediction accuracy through selective feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20220130494A1Systems, methods, and media for molecule design using machine learning mechanisms
Publication Date: 2022.04.28 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US20220130494A1 patent drawing
  • US20220130494A1 patent drawing
  • US20220130494A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Mechanisms for molecule design using machine learning include: forming a first training set for a neural network using, for each of a first plurality of known molecules, a plurality of input values that represent the structure of the known molecule and a plurality of functional property values for the known molecule; training the neural network using the first training set; proposing a first plurality of proposed molecules, and predicting first predicted functional property values of the first plurality of proposed molecules that have the desired function property values; causing the first plurality of proposed molecules to be synthesized to form a first plurality of synthesized molecules; receiving first measured functional property values of the first plurality of synthesized molecules; and adding data regarding the first plurality of synthesized molecules to the first training set to form a second training set and retrain the neural network using the second training set.