Neural Network Failure Detection in MR Scanners

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing failures in medical imaging machines like MR scanners are manual, error-prone, and lack sensitivity and specificity, often requiring expert knowledge and distinguishing between system errors and poor parameterization issues.

Innovation Solution

An automated failure analysis method using a trained neural network that calculates performance indicators from input data, including image and metadata, to identify failure sources with probability measures, allowing for early detection and differentiation between system errors and parameterization issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual failure analysis by service engineers is used, then expert knowledge can be applied to diagnose system errors, but the process is error-prone and relies heavily on technician experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure analysis accuracyVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-diagnosis of MR scanner failures through a neural network that autonomously analyzes performance indicators and identifies failure sources without requiring manual intervention by service engineers, thereby improving reliability while reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of service engineer diagnosis with an automated computational system using neural networks and performance indicator analysis, substituting human expertise with an automated intelligent system that consistently identifies failures without human error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If automated failure analysis is implemented, then manual errors are reduced and consistency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure analysis consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it monitors system performance, detects failures, identifies failure sources, and provides diagnostic recommendations, thereby achieving high reliability through a single multi-functional automated system rather than multiple separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces performance indicators as intermediary metrics that bridge the gap between raw system data and failure diagnosis, allowing the neural network to automatically translate complex system states into actionable diagnostic information without requiring direct complex analysis of all system parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If performance indicators are calculated from raw data before image reconstruction, then early detection is achieved and costs are reduced, but the processing time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection timeVSAvoidprocessing power
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of performance indicators from raw data immediately after acquisition, before image reconstruction occurs. This early detection capability allows failures to be identified at the earliest possible stage, reducing downtime and costs while the neural network processes the extracted indicators to identify potential issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10896108B2Automatic failure detection in magnetic resonance apparatuses
Publication Date: 2021.01.19 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US10896108B2 patent drawing
  • US10896108B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method, a computer and a medical computer for automatic failure analysis in order to provide a cause of failure of the medical imaging apparatus during operation, input data are read into the computer that include raw data or image data, acquired by the imaging apparatus. A set of performance indicators in the input data is calculated by the computer. A trained neural network system is accessed with the calculated performance indicators, in order to provide result data that, in the case of a failure, identify a failure source.