Neural Network Core System Using Non-Linear PCA and Tree Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional artificial intelligence decision-making systems using linear data structures in neural networks produce non-distinguishable and low-value decision results, limiting their usability and practicality across various scenarios.

Innovation Solution

An artificial intelligence decision-making neuro network core system that combines non-linear analysis and feedback mechanisms, utilizing an electronic device with modules for data preprocessing, weight computation, non-linear computing, and data tuning to generate decision results adaptable to diverse scenarios, incorporating an unsupervised neural network interface, asymmetric hidden layers, and non-linear PCA modules for enhanced decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional linear data structure is used in neural network, then the system is simple and easy to implement, but the decision results are non-distinguishable and have low value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoiddecision result value
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies non-linear data structures (curved/branching tree structures) instead of traditional linear (straight) data structures in the neural network. This curvature/non-linearity transformation enables the system to capture complex patterns and relationships in data, producing distinguishable and high-value decision results while maintaining implementation feasibility through systematic processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Device complexity

If traditional linear neural network is used, then the system structure is simple, but the decision results have low reference and usability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structure complexityVSAvoiddecision result usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing into distinct functional modules: data preprocessing module, tree-structure construction module, weight computation module, non-linear computing module, and feedback tuning module. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific tasks, enhancing the system's adaptability to different scenarios while keeping the overall structure organized and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic feedback mechanisms where decision results are tuned and adjusted based on feedback information. The system dynamically adapts its processing through feedback loops that refine the non-linear computing results, enabling the decision-making system to adjust to various scenarios and improve result usability rather than following a static linear path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of information

If non-linear analysis and feedback mechanism are combined, then the decision results accommodate various scenarios and have high value, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision result valueVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the output of the non-linear computing is fed back through a tuning module that adjusts and refines the decision results. This feedback loop enables the system to accommodate various scenarios by continuously refining its outputs based on performance, thereby maintaining high decision result value while managing complexity through structured feedback processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple processing approaches (non-linear analysis, tree-structure data organization, weight computation, and feedback tuning) into a composite system architecture. This composite structure integrates different functional elements that work together to produce high-value decision results, similar to how composite materials combine different properties to achieve superior performance while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11580404B2Artificial intelligence decision making neuro network core system and information processing method using the same
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 AHP TECH INC
  • US11580404B2 patent drawing
  • US11580404B2 patent drawing
  • US11580404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Artificial intelligence decision making neuro network core system and information processing method using the same include an electronic device linking to a unsupervised neural network interface module, a asymmetric hidden layers input module linking to the unsupervised neural network interface module and a neuron module formed with tree-structured data, a layered weight parameter module linking to the neuron module formed with tree-structured data and an non-linear PCA (Principal Component Analysis) module, an input module of the lead backpropagation unit linking to the non-linear PCA module and a tuning module, an output module of the lead backpropagation unit linking to tuning module and the non-linear PCA module; when the electronic device receives raw data, processing and learning the raw data via all the modules, and updating programs to generate decision results that accommodate a variety of scenarios, in order to elevate the reference value and practicality of the decision result.