Neural Network Policy Conditioning for Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for solving optimization problems, particularly combinatorial optimization, face challenges in efficiency and generalizability, as they often require extensive computational resources and struggle with adapting to different instances of optimization problems.

Innovation Solution

The method involves training a neural network to condition its policy on an N-dimensional vector from a latent space, allowing the network to generate diverse solutions for optimization problems. This approach enables the network to specialize in different subsets of optimization problems, improving generalizability and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If reinforcement learning systems are used to solve optimization problems, then solutions can be generated for complex combinatorial optimization problems, but computational resources are excessively consumed and training time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to solve optimization problemsVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-training the neural network on a broad dataset of optimization problems before deployment. This pre-training establishes a generalized policy that can handle various optimization tasks without requiring extensive computational resources during actual problem-solving operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by adjusting the neural network's policy parameters based on the specific characteristics of each optimization problem instance. This allows the same network to adapt to different problem types by modifying its internal parameters rather than retraining the entire model, significantly reducing computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If reinforcement learning systems are trained on specific optimization problems, then they can solve those problems, but they struggle to generalize to different instances of optimization problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution accuracyVSAvoidgeneralizability to different problem instances
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by designing a single neural network architecture that can handle multiple types of optimization problems through a unified policy framework. The network is trained on diverse problem instances and uses problem-specific parameter adjustments to adapt to different task requirements, eliminating the need for separate specialized models for each problem type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-training the neural network on a comprehensive dataset encompassing various optimization problem types and configurations. This broad pre-training establishes a robust generalized policy that can transfer knowledge across different problem instances, improving reliability while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple neural networks are trained for different optimization problems, then each network can specialize in its specific problem type, but device complexity and training time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecialization in specific problem typesVSAvoidnumber of neural networks required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces multiple specialized neural networks with a single universal network that can handle various optimization problems. This universal network maintains specialization capabilities through parameter adjustments and problem-specific conditioning, reducing device complexity from multiple networks to one while preserving the ability to solve diverse optimization tasks effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple specialized networks into a single unified network architecture. By combining the functionalities of what would have been separate specialized models into one network with adaptive parameters, the system reduces overall system complexity while maintaining the specialized problem-solving capabilities through conditional processing and parameter tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250131279A1Training neural networks for policy adaptation
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 INSTADEEP LTD
  • US20250131279A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131279A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131279A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, storage mediums comprising instructions, and methods of training a neural network to determine solutions to an optimization problem are provided. The methods involve obtaining training data representing a plurality of instances of an optimization problem, each instance being represented by a set of state parameters. For each instance of the optimization problem, a plurality of solutions are generated, each solution being generated using a neural network conditioned on an N-dimensional vector. Training the neural network conditioned on an N-dimensional vector associated with the highest performing solution is performed. Systems, storage mediums, and methods of using an neural network trained to be conditioned on an N-dimensional vector are also provided. These methods involve a search process for identifying an N-dimensional vector selected from a vector latent space to obtain a solution for the instance of the optimization problem.