Neural Network Data Processing for Spectroscopy Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data processing methods for spectroscopy data, such as ARPES, face challenges in reducing data acquisition time while minimizing noise, with techniques like Gaussian smoothing often causing data blurring and loss of essential information.

Innovation Solution

A data processing method involving the training of a neural network to convert input spectroscopy data into output data with a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), where the neural network is optimized using generated data that conforms to a statistical distribution, such as Poisson distribution, to enhance data quality and reduce noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If data acquisition time is reduced, then productivity is improved, but noise increases and measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata acquisition speedVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network is trained in advance using generated data that conforms to the statistical distribution of original spectroscopy data. This preliminary training enables the network to learn effective denoising patterns before actual data processing, allowing rapid processing of low-SNR data without requiring extensive acquisition time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Generated data conforming to statistical distribution serves as an intermediary between the training process and actual data processing. This intermediary data enables the neural network to learn from synthetic examples that mimic real data characteristics, bridging the gap between training and deployment while improving measurement precision on actual acquired data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If Gaussian smoothing is applied to reduce noise, then measurement precision is improved, but data blurring occurs and essential information is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoiddata blurring
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/mathematical smoothing operations (Gaussian filtering) with a neural network-based approach. The neural network learns complex denoising patterns from training data and applies them to processed data, achieving noise reduction without the blurring effects inherent in conventional smoothing methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network dynamically adjusts processing parameters based on the input data characteristics. Instead of applying fixed smoothing kernels, the network adapts its filtering behavior to preserve essential features while removing noise, changing the parameter space from static to dynamic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250155389A1Method and device for processing data conforming to statistical distribution
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY R&DB FOUNDATION
  • US20250155389A1 patent drawing
  • US20250155389A1 patent drawing
  • US20250155389A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data processing method according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises the steps of: training a neural network; receiving input data from the outside; and converting the received input data by means of the trained neural network, wherein the training step comprises the steps of: generating one or more pieces of generative data from raw data; converting the generative data into output data by means of the neural network; evaluating the output data on the basis of the raw data; and optimizing the neural network on the basis of the evaluation result, wherein the raw data and the generative data conform to a statistical distribution, and the raw data and the output data have higher signal-to-noise ratios than the generative data.