Neural Network Spray Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for setting spray-coating parameters are time-consuming and reliant on operator experience, lacking efficient digital solutions for optimizing parameters such as paint flow, atomization air, and distance from the surface.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a machine learning algorithm, specifically a convolutional neural network, trained on a dataset of sample and operational spraying profiles, to predict optimal spray-coating parameters by analyzing paint thickness distributions on sample surfaces, reducing the need for trial and error and operator expertise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional trial and error method is used to optimize spray-coating parameters, then operator experience can guide the process, but the process becomes very time-consuming and requires a large number of testing parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter optimization accuracyVSAvoidtime for parameter setting
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital copies (synthetic images) of spray-coating patterns that mimic real physical measurements. These synthetic images are generated from operational parameters through a forward model, allowing the neural network to learn from大量 simulated data without requiring equivalent physical testing. This copying approach enables the system to achieve high measurement precision for parameter optimization while avoiding the time-consuming trial and error process with actual spray-coating operations and testing parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training the neural network on a large dataset of synthetic spray-coating patterns generated before actual use. The forward model pre-computes the relationship between operational parameters and spray patterns, creating a comprehensive training dataset in advance. When deployed, the system can immediately provide optimized parameters without requiring time-consuming physical trials, as the learning is already completed in the preliminary training phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple optimal spray-coating parameters are sought through experimental setups, then comprehensive parameter optimization can be achieved, but a large number of testing parts are needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter coverageVSAvoidnumber of testing parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses synthetic image copying to represent diverse spray-coating scenarios without needing physical testing parts for each scenario. The forward model generates synthetic patterns that cover a wide range of operational parameters and spray conditions, allowing the neural network to learn comprehensive parameter relationships. This approach achieves high adaptability and versatility in parameter optimization while eliminating the need for large quantities of physical testing parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies operational parameters in the synthetic data generation process to cover comprehensive parameter spaces. The forward model allows efficient exploration of multiple parameter combinations (paint flow, atomization air, shaping air, rotation speed, distance from surface) by simply changing input parameters rather than physically reconfiguring equipment for each test. This enables comprehensive parameter coverage with virtual experiments instead of physical testing parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If digital representation of spray-coating patterns is obtained, then data acquisition is enabled, but no further use of these data for analyzing or providing spray-coating parameters is described

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata utilizationVSAvoidparameter provision efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the neural network to analyze spray-coating pattern images and generate optimized operational parameters. The system takes digital representations of spray patterns as input, processes them through the trained network, and outputs refined parameter recommendations. This closed-loop feedback mechanism transforms previously unused digital data into actionable parameter optimization, improving both data utilization and parameter provision efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual parameter adjustment and analysis with an automated neural network system. Instead of operators manually analyzing spray pattern images and adjusting parameters, the deep learning model automatically processes digital pattern data and generates optimized parameters. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with intelligent automation enables effective utilization of digital data and dramatically improves productivity in parameter provision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4486514B1Method for providing parameters for setting a spray-coating apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 SPRAYVISION SRO
  • EP4486514B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4486514B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4486514B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Method for providing parameters for setting a spray-coating apparatus. A machine learning algorithm, such as a neural network, implemented by a control unit and trained on a training dataset comprising spraying profiles and corresponding spraying patterns is used in the method. The algorithm is trained to simulate a spraying pattern, i.e., a representation of a paint distribution, when provided with a spraying profile, i.e., a set of spraying parameters which could be used to set a spray-coating apparatus. The method comprises iterations of using the simulation to provide an algorithm output describing an expected spraying pattern for a provided input profile, and then evaluating the output by predetermined criteria. If the output complies with the criteria, it is used for setting a spray- coating apparatus. If it does not comply, the input profile is adjusted.