Topology Optimization Using Neural Network Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing topology optimization methods rely on gradient information or heuristic criteria, which are not applicable for problems with severe nonlinearities or complex constraints, and are costly for high-dimensional optimization problems, especially when sensitivity information or heuristics are not available.

Innovation Solution

A dual optimization process using machine learning or stochastic optimization to generate update strategies for material redistribution in topology optimization, allowing for the application of non-gradient optimization strategies and reusing update strategies for similar optimization objectives with different boundary conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If gradient-based optimization methods are used for topology optimization, then optimization efficiency is improved, but applicability is limited to problems where sensitivity information is available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization efficiencyVSAvoidapplicability to problems with severe nonlinearities
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces gradient-based optimization mechanisms with a neural network-based approach. The neural network is trained to directly map design variables to optimized topologies, substituting the traditional gradient descent mechanism. This allows the system to handle problems with severe nonlinearities and complex constraints where analytical gradients are unavailable, while maintaining optimization efficiency through the learned mapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a neural network model that copies the optimization knowledge from training data. Instead of computing gradients for each new problem, the system uses the trained neural network to generate optimized topologies by copying patterns learned during training. This enables rapid optimization for new design problems without requiring sensitivity information, thus improving both efficiency and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional topology optimization methods are applied to high-dimensional problems, then design space exploration is thorough, but computational cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign optimization qualityVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training the neural network on a dataset of optimization problems. This training phase captures the essential optimization patterns and relationships in the high-dimensional design space. Once trained, the neural network can rapidly generate optimized topologies for new problems without requiring extensive computational resources, thus reducing the computational cost while maintaining design optimization quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation by using a neural network to directly predict optimized topologies from design variables. This transforms the traditional iterative optimization process into a direct parameter mapping problem. The neural network learns the complex relationships between design parameters and optimal topologies, enabling efficient high-dimensional optimization without the computational burden of traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If problem-specific sensitivity analysis is performed for each optimization case, then optimization accuracy is improved, but method complexity and preparation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal neural network model that can handle multiple optimization problems with different objective functions and constraints. The single trained model serves multiple functions by predicting optimized topologies for various problem types without requiring problem-specific sensitivity analysis. This reduces method complexity while maintaining optimization accuracy through the generalized learning capability of the neural network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10853528B2Optimizing the design of physical structures/objects
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10853528B2 patent drawing
  • US10853528B2 patent drawing
  • US10853528B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one aspect, a computer-assisted method for the optimization of the design of physical bodies, such as land, air and sea vehicles and robots and/or parts thereof, is provided comprising the steps of: representing the design to be optimized as a mesh, generating update signals to optimize the mesh representation, applying an optimization algorithm until a stop criterion has been reached, and outputting a signal representing the optimized design.