Neural ODE Controller Design for Dynamical System Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for modeling dynamical systems using deep neural networks face challenges in identifying transfer functions due to reliance on brute force approximation, making it difficult to analyze and design controllers effectively.

Innovation Solution

The use of neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs) as a controller for dynamical systems, where a NODE model is trained using measurement and control data to provide analytically tractable building blocks, allowing for easier parameter extraction and systematic analysis of system properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If deep neural networks are used to model dynamical systems, then the system can capture complex non-linear behaviors, but it becomes difficult to identify transfer functions due to reliance on brute force approximation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to model complex non-linear behaviorsVSAvoiddifficulty to identify transfer functions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the neural network into structured components with explicit transfer functions. Instead of treating the network as a monolithic black box, it divides the computation into discrete layers and operations where each component has a known, analyzable transfer function, enabling systematic identification while maintaining modeling flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the approach from learning arbitrary complex functions to learning parameters within a structured framework with predefined transfer functions. By changing the parameters of known functional forms rather than approximating unknown functions, the system maintains adaptability while enabling analytical tractability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Extent of automation

If traditional neural networks are used for controller design, then they can learn from data, but systematic analysis of system properties becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to learn from dataVSAvoidsystematic analysis of system properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between data-driven learning and systematic analysis. The structured NODE architecture with explicit transfer functions serves as a mediator that allows both automated learning from data and formal systematic analysis of system properties, bridging the gap between these two requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary structuring of the neural network before the learning process. By pre-defining the transfer functions and network architecture structure, the system enables subsequent systematic analysis while still allowing data-driven parameter optimization, rather than attempting analysis after arbitrary network structures are learned.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If brute force approximation is used to identify transfer functions, then the system can be trained flexibly, but scalability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining flexibilityVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic structured NODEs where the network architecture and transfer functions can adapt to different dynamical systems while maintaining a consistent structured framework. This dynamic adaptability within structure enables both training flexibility across different applications and scalability through systematic parameter optimization rather than brute force approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12236330B2Analysis and design of dynamical system controllers using neural differential equations
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 SRI INTERNATIONAL
  • US12236330B2 patent drawing
  • US12236330B2 patent drawing
  • US12236330B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In general, the disclosure describes techniques for characterizing a dynamical system and a neural ordinary differential equation (NODE)-based controller for the dynamical system. An example analysis system is configured to: obtain a set of parameters of a NODE model used to implement the NODE-based controller, the NODE model trained to control the dynamical system; determine, based on the set of parameters, a system property of a combined system comprising the dynamical system and the NODE-based controller, the system property comprising one or more of an accuracy, safety, reliability, reachability, or controllability of the combined system; and output the system property to modify one or more of the dynamical system or the NODE-based controller to meet a required specification for the combined system.