Neural Operator Well Casing Integrity Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inversion algorithms and beamforming methods fall short in efficiently solving for pipe properties and leak source location parameters, particularly due to bottlenecks in the forward model, even with high-performance computing or GPUs, and often require post-processing that reduces their value for real-time decision-making in oil and gas exploration.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Fourier Neural Operators (FNO) or Physics-Informed Neural Operators (PINO) to replace traditional numerical forward modeling, allowing for more efficient mapping of material functions to physical responses and vice versa, enabling real-time pipe inspection and leak source location determination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional inversion algorithms or beamforming methods are used to solve for pipe properties or leak source location, then the problem can be solved, but the computational efficiency is poor and real-time decision-making is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional numerical forward modeling (mechanical/computational system) with a neural operator that directly maps material functions to physical responses. This substitution eliminates the need for iterative numerical solutions and significantly reduces processing time, enabling real-time pipe inspection and leak detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified representation (copy) of the complex physical system through a neural operator that captures the essential mapping relationships between material properties and physical responses. This copy allows for rapid inference without repeatedly solving the full physical model, thereby improving computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Speed

If traditional forward modeling is used, then physical accuracy can be maintained, but the speed of data processing is slow and real-time applications are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing speedVSAvoidphysical accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes traditional numerical forward modeling with a neural operator that has been trained to maintain physical accuracy while enabling rapid data processing. The neural operator learns the mapping relationships from training data, allowing for fast inference that preserves physical fidelity without the computational burden of traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If post-processing is used to obtain inversion or beamforming results, then comprehensive analysis can be performed, but the value for real-time decision-making is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time decision-making capabilityVSAvoidtime delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the essential mapping from material functions to physical responses in advance through training the neural operator. During actual application, the pre-trained operator can immediately provide results without requiring time-consuming post-processing, enabling real-time decision-making while maintaining comprehensive analysis capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly enhances the efficiency of pipe property determination and leak source localization, enabling real-time decision-making by overcoming the limitations of traditional methods and improving the accuracy and speed of data processing.

Implementation Method 1

performing a Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) or Physics-Informed Neural Operator (PINO) inversion to determine the pipe status or leak source location

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFourier Neural Operator transformation:

Implementation Method 2

The implementation of Fourier Neural Operators (FNO) or Physics-Informed Neural Operators (PINO) to replace traditional numerical forward modeling, allowing for more efficient mapping of material functions to physical responses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeural operator mapping:

Data Source

PatentUS20240125229A1Fast Proxy Model For Well Casing Integrity Evaluation
Publication Date: 2024.04.18 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US20240125229A1 patent drawing
  • US20240125229A1 patent drawing
  • US20240125229A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and non-transitory storage computer-readable medium for performing a neural operator on one or more wellbore measurements. The method may comprise o obtaining one or more measurements, performing a measurement normalization on the one or more measurements to form one or more normalized measurements, forming a material function with the one or more normalized measurements, and forming a neural operator generated physical response with a neural operator and the material function. The method may further comprise forming a beamforming map with the one or more measurements, and forming a neural operator leak source location map with a neural operator and the one or more measurements.