Implantable Device Neural Potential Detection via Signal Variance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical devices face challenges in detecting neural potentials evoked by electrical stimulation due to their long evolution time and potential masking by stimulation artifacts, especially at high stimulation rates and limited bandwidth, making it difficult to capture and distinguish these responses.

Innovation Solution

An implantable medical device utilizes variations in electrical signals, such as standard deviation or variance, to differentiate second-order potentials from artifacts, allowing for closed-loop stimulation adjustments and improved detection of neural responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If electrical stimulation is delivered at high rates, then therapeutic efficacy is improved, but neural potentials are masked by stimulation artifacts making detection difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation rateVSAvoiddetection of neural potentials
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the neural potential signal from the composite signal by separating it from the stimulation artifact. This is achieved through signal processing techniques that isolate the evoked potential component from the dominant artifact, enabling detection even at high stimulation rates where the artifact would otherwise mask the neural response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary signal processing stage between stimulation delivery and detection. This intermediary processing includes filtering, averaging, or other computational methods that enable the detection system to distinguish neural potentials from artifacts, effectively acting as a mediator that resolves the masking problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If bandwidth is limited, then device complexity is reduced, but ability to capture and distinguish neural responses deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth limitationsVSAvoiddetection of neural potentials
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary signal processing actions before final detection and analysis. By pre-processing the signals through filtering, averaging multiple stimuli responses, or other computational preparations, the system enhances the detectability of neural potentials within limited bandwidth constraints, avoiding the need for higher bandwidth hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple copies of the stimulation signal and averages them together. By delivering repeated stimuli and averaging the responses, the system enhances the signal-to-noise ratio and makes neural potentials detectable even with limited bandwidth, as the consistent evoked potential pattern emerges from the averaged copies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of time

If neural potentials are detected directly, then response time is reduced, but detection precision deteriorates due to masking by artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevolution time of neural potentialsVSAvoiddetection precision of neural potentials
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous monitoring and processing of electrical signals during and after stimulation delivery. Rather than attempting single-point detection, the system continuously acquires signals and processes them in real-time, maintaining detection capability throughout the evolution of neural potentials while progressively improving precision through ongoing signal analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the detected signals are processed and used to adjust subsequent detection parameters or stimulation delivery. This feedback loop allows the system to refine its detection approach based on observed signals, improving precision over time while maintaining responsive detection of evolving neural potentials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230062062A1Detection of neural potential evoked in response to electrical stimulation
Publication Date: 2023.03.02 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US20230062062A1 patent drawing
  • US20230062062A1 patent drawing
  • US20230062062A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example system includes a memory; and processing circuitry configured to: cause an implantable stimulation device to deliver a plurality of doses of electrical stimulation to a patient; receive, for each respective dose of the plurality of doses, a respective electrical signal of a plurality of electrical signals; and determine, based on a variation of the plurality of electrical signals, whether the plurality of doses of electrical stimulation evoked neural potentials in the patient.