Neural Network Predictive Control for Real-Time Process Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional neural network-based control systems for continuous processes lack guarantees of generating optimal control signals in real-time environments, as they often mimic historical controller behavior without ensuring optimal performance.

Innovation Solution

A predictive control system using a neural network model that predicts controlled variable values, evaluates an objective function, and performs iterative optimization to generate optimal manipulated variable values, incorporating disturbance forecasting and scenario-based analysis to enhance control signal effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a controller neural network is trained to mimic historical controller behavior, then the system can operate with neural network-based control, but there is no guarantee that the control signals generated are optimal in real-time environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural network-based control capabilityVSAvoidoptimality guarantee of control signals
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the neural network predictor provides predicted controlled variable values to the optimization module. The optimization module uses this feedback to iteratively adjust manipulated variable values, evaluating an objective function at each iteration to ensure optimal control signals are generated based on current process conditions rather than just mimicking historical behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network predictor performs preliminary action by predicting future values of controlled variables based on current manipulated variable values. This allows the optimization module to evaluate the objective function in advance for multiple iterations and select optimal manipulated variable values before actual control action is taken, ensuring optimality rather than relying on historical patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If iterative optimization is performed to generate optimal manipulated variable values, then control signal optimality is improved, but computational time and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimality of control signalsVSAvoidcomputational time for optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a limited number of iterative optimization steps (excessive action) rather than exhaustive optimization. The optimization module iterates a predetermined number of times to generate optimal manipulated variable values, which provides sufficient optimality for real-time control without requiring complete exhaustion of all possible solutions, thus balancing computational time with control signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If disturbance forecasting and scenario-based analysis are incorporated, then control effectiveness is improved, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol effectivenessVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary disturbance forecasting using the neural network predictor to estimate future values of controlled variables under different scenarios. This preliminary action allows the optimization module to account for potential disturbances and scenario variations in advance when evaluating the objective function, improving control effectiveness without requiring complex real-time disturbance rejection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12449775B2Control system with neural network predictor for industrial processes with chemical reactions
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 IMUBIT ISRAEL LTD
  • US12449775B2 patent drawing
  • US12449775B2 patent drawing
  • US12449775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A predictive control system for automatic operation of a plant includes controllable equipment and a predictive controller. The predictive controller is configured to use a predictive model to predict values of controlled variables predicted to result from operating the controllable equipment in accordance with corresponding values of manipulated variables, use the values of the controlled variables predicted by the predictive model to evaluate an objective function that defines a control objective as a function of at least the controlled variables, perform a predictive optimization process to generate optimal values of the manipulated variables for a plurality of time steps in an optimization period using the predictive model and the objective function, and operate the controllable equipment by providing the controllable equipment with control signals based on the optimal values of the manipulated variables generated by performing the predictive optimization process.