Neural Stimulation Analyzer Using Behavioral Data Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neural stimulation systems for treating neurological disorders, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), face challenges in determining optimal stimulation parameters like frequency and pulse duration, which can be time-consuming and not suitable for real-time interventions, affecting the efficacy of treatments.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented neural stimulation system that analyzes muscle contractions and movements to derive neural data, assess the neural state, and determine appropriate stimulation parameters, using cloud computing and machine learning techniques to provide real-time adjustments in stimulation parameters based on cognitive and behavioral data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional neural stimulation parameter determination methods are used, then treatment coverage is comprehensive, but the process is time-consuming and not suitable for real-time interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time parameter adjustment speedVSAvoidparameter determination time
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors behavioral data and neural signals, comparing actual outcomes against predicted outcomes to automatically adjust stimulation parameters in real-time. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables dynamic optimization without manual intervention, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive treatment and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The neural stimulation system performs self-adjustment of parameters by autonomously processing behavioral data and neural signals to determine optimal stimulation settings. This self-service capability eliminates the need for continuous manual parameter determination, enabling real-time adaptation while maintaining comprehensive treatment coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual determination of stimulation parameters is performed, then parameter accuracy can be ensured, but the process is not suitable for real-time interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment throughputVSAvoidstimulation parameter accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces behavioral data and neural signals as intermediary measurements that objectively quantify neural state and treatment response. These intermediaries enable automated, real-time parameter determination with high precision, replacing manual judgment while maintaining or improving accuracy through continuous objective measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes stimulation parameters based on real-time analysis of behavioral data and neural signals. By continuously adjusting frequency, amplitude, and other parameters according to measured neural state, the system achieves both high productivity through automation and high precision through adaptive optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If standardized neural stimulation protocols are used, then treatment consistency is maintained, but personalization for individual patients is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment personalizationVSAvoidtreatment protocol consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, standardized protocols to dynamic, adaptive treatment that continuously adjusts parameters based on real-time behavioral data and neural signals. This dynamic approach maintains consistency through systematic decision-making while achieving personalization through individual-specific response patterns and continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10226629B2Analyzer for behavioral analysis and parameterization of neural stimulation
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10226629B2 patent drawing
  • US10226629B2 patent drawing
  • US10226629B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are directed to a computer implemented neural stimulation system having a first module configured to derive neural data from muscle contractions or movements of a subject. The system further includes a second module configured to derive a neural state assessment of the subject based at least in part on the neural data. The system further includes a third module configured to derive at least one neural stimulation parameter based at least in part on the neural state assessment. The system further includes a fourth module configured to deliver neural stimulations to the subject based at least in part on the at least one neural stimulation parameter.