Neural Network Weight Updating for Spatially Selective Contraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for reducing computation in machine learning models, such as creating lightweight models, often result in accuracy deterioration and inference errors due to conventional contraction techniques that uniformly reduce spatial information, leading to suboptimal weight retention and inference errors.

Innovation Solution

A computation device and method that updates the weights of a neural network model based on spatial information using an inference result and importance coefficients, allowing selective contraction of the model to focus on areas requiring accuracy while reducing computation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional contraction technology is applied after creating a lightweight model with reduced spatial information, then the model size is reduced, but accuracy deteriorates in the area where space has been reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel sizeVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the treatment of spatial regions. It creates a mask that identifies important regions (where objects are likely to exist) and applies contraction differently to these regions versus unimportant regions. The contraction rate is adjusted based on the mask values, allowing the model to maintain accuracy in critical areas while reducing size in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the spatial information into important and unimportant regions using a mask generated from depth information and object probability predictions. This segmentation allows the contraction process to operate independently on different regions, applying stricter contraction to unimportant regions while being more conservative with important regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If conventional contraction technology is applied to a lightweight model, then the model parameters are reduced, but inference errors occur due to superfluous retention of features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter redundancyVSAvoidinference accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by first creating a mask that identifies important spatial regions before applying the contraction process. This pre-computed mask guides the subsequent contraction, ensuring that features in important regions are preserved while allowing more aggressive reduction in unimportant regions, thereby preventing inference errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the depth information and object probability predictions are used to generate masks that feedback into the contraction process. This feedback loop ensures that the contraction process adapts to the specific characteristics of the input data and maintains accuracy where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the range of searching for disparities is reduced to decrease computation, then computational load is reduced, but accuracy deteriorates in areas where information is not required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing frequencyVSAvoiddisparity accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the contraction rate based on spatial regions. Regions with higher object probability and specific depth characteristics receive lower contraction rates (preserving more features), while regions with lower object probability receive higher contraction rates (reducing features more aggressively). This allows the system to maintain processing frequency while preserving accuracy where objects are likely to exist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4718330A1Computation device, updating method, and environment recognition device
Publication Date: 2026.04.01 ASTEMO LTD
  • EP4718330A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4718330A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4718330A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A computation device comprising an inference unit that uses an inference model, which is a neural network model, and outputs an inference result corresponding to input data, and an updating unit that updates a weight of the inference model based on the inference result, and spatial information indicating at least a part of an area in the input data.