Neuromodulation Device with Automated Movement Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neuromodulation devices for treating conditions like overactive bladder and incontinence require invasive procedures, are painful, and have low efficacy due to inaccurate nerve targeting and reliance on subjective patient feedback, leading to prolonged treatment sessions and potential nerve damage.

Innovation Solution

A device with a control unit, electrodes, and a response detector (such as optical, infrared, or accelerometer sensors) that automatically adjusts electrical pulse parameters based on patient movement feedback, ensuring precise nerve stimulation without the need for invasive procedures or trained medical personnel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If invasive needle insertion is used for nerve stimulation, then nerve targeting accuracy is improved, but patient pain and risk of nerve damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenerve targeting accuracyVSAvoidpatient pain and nerve damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical needle insertion method with a non-invasive electrical stimulation system that uses surface electrodes and electromagnetic fields to stimulate nerves, eliminating physical penetration while maintaining therapeutic effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a response detector as an intermediary component that objectively measures patient response to stimulation, replacing the need for direct needle-nerve contact and subjective patient reporting, thereby reducing both invasiveness and measurement uncertainty

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If subjective patient feedback is used to determine stimulation effectiveness, then treatment simplicity is maintained, but measurement precision of nerve stimulation effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment simplicityVSAvoidnerve stimulation effectiveness measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated feedback system where a response detector continuously monitors patient response to electrical stimulation and provides real-time data to a controller, which adjusts stimulation parameters automatically to optimize treatment effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of stimulation parameters based on automated detection of patient response, reducing the need for continuous manual intervention while maintaining high measurement precision through objective sensing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If fixed average current parameters are used for all patients, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to individual patient needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter setting complexityVSAvoidindividual patient parameter adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static fixed-parameter system into a dynamic adaptive system where stimulation current parameters are automatically adjusted in real-time based on individual patient response characteristics detected by the response sensor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically modifies electrical stimulation parameters including current amplitude, pulse duration, and frequency based on real-time detection of patient response, enabling customization for each patient without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If prolonged treatment sessions are used to compensate for low efficacy, then treatment thoroughness is improved, but loss of time for both patient and medical staff increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidtreatment session duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The automated feedback system continuously monitors treatment effectiveness and provides real-time information to adjust parameters, enabling faster convergence to optimal treatment settings and reducing the number of sessions needed to achieve therapeutic goals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual trial-and-adjustment methods with automated electronic control and sensing systems that rapidly identify effective parameters, significantly reducing the time required to achieve effective treatment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables more effective and efficient treatment by accurately targeting nerves, reducing pain and risk of nerve damage, and shortening treatment sessions, with adjustable parameters tailored to individual patient needs, improving treatment outcomes for conditions like overactive bladder and incontinence.

Implementation Method 1

A device with a control unit, electrodes, and a response detector (such as optical, infrared, or accelerometer sensors) that automatically adjusts electrical pulse parameters based on patient movement feedback

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

A device with a control unit, electrodes, and a response detector (such as optical, infrared, or accelerometer sensors) that automatically adjusts electrical pulse parameters based on patient movement feedback

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 3

A device with a control unit, electrodes, and a response detector (such as optical, infrared, or accelerometer sensors) that automatically adjusts electrical pulse parameters based on patient movement feedback

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer sensing: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 4

a device for stimulating the peripheral nerves, comprising a memory unit, at least one electrode attached to the patient's body for generating pulses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS11420052B2Device and method for neuromodulation treatment
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 STIMVIA SRO
  • US11420052B2 patent drawing
  • US11420052B2 patent drawing
  • US11420052B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a device for stimulating peripheral nerves, comprising a memory, at least one electrode attached to the patient's body for generating pulses, and a control unit connected with an electrode for setting at least one electrode pulse parameter. The device further includes a detector of response to neuromodulation connected with a control unit for transmitting information on a frequency of movement of at least a part of the body to the control unit, and a controller connected with the control unit for acquiring a user input. The control unit of the device further sets flow of current of electrode pulses automatically, depending on information on a frequency value of movement of a part of the body. The invention further provides a method for treating the syndromes of an overactive bladder using a neuromodulation device. And method of collecting information of such devices.