Neuromorphic Synaptic Model Hardware Architecture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current biological models for neuronal synapses, particularly those involving glutamatergic synapses, face challenges in accuracy and computational efficiency, leading to high costs and limitations in simulating large neural networks in real-time, with existing neuromorphic platforms struggling to capture the complexity of synaptic plasticity and its implications in learning and memory.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for modeling neuronal synaptic functionality using an optimized computation core with a presynaptic component, retrograde signaling component, and postsynaptic receptor component, incorporating a retrograde messenger that modulates plasticity parameters and activity spike strength, allowing for real-time simulation of neural networks and addressing synaptic strength and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If software-based simulations are used to model neuronal synapses with high biological accuracy, then modeling precision is improved, but computational cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodeling precisionVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional software-based numerical simulations with a hardware-based neuromorphic computing system. The biological processes of neuronal signaling and synaptic plasticity are directly implemented through electronic circuits that mimic the physical and chemical dynamics of real neurons, eliminating the need for computationally intensive software calculations while maintaining biological fidelity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates physical copies of biological synaptic structures using electronic circuits. The hardware architecture replicates the functional dynamics of presynaptic terminals, synaptic clefts, and postsynaptic receptors through analogous electronic components, allowing direct physical simulation rather than mathematical approximation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If large neural networks are simulated in real-time, then productivity is improved, but computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation speedVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes software computation with hardware execution, where electronic circuits naturally operate in real-time parallel fashion. This enables large-scale neural network simulations to run at speeds comparable to biological systems without requiring massive computational resources, as the hardware inherently performs the simulation functions simultaneously rather than sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If analog circuits are used to implement synaptic models, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability decreases due to transistor mismatch and process variation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit complexityVSAvoidmodel reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from continuous analog voltage representations to discrete digital logic levels for synaptic weight encoding. This parameter change allows the system to maintain the simplicity of analog-like parallel processing while achieving the reliability of digital logic, as discrete states are immune to the gradual drift and mismatch problems that plague purely analog implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If detailed synaptic plasticity mechanisms are modeled, then modeling precision is improved, but computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynaptic plasticity accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces software-based temporal calculations with hardware-based real-time dynamics. The detailed mechanisms of synaptic plasticity, including short-term and long-term changes, are implemented through physical circuit behaviors that naturally evolve over time without requiring computational steps, thereby achieving high precision without the time penalty of software simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240296961A1System and method for modeling neuronal synaptic functionality on a combined software and hardware architecture
Publication Date: 2024.09.05 THE RES FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIV OF NEW YORK
  • US20240296961A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296961A1 patent drawing
  • US20240296961A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for modeling neuronal synaptic functionality at least partially instantiated on an optimized computation core of one or more high-speed processors. The synaptic model is preferably created as a neural net and includes, at least, a presynaptic component with a presynaptic target having, at least, a plasticity parameter and activity spike strength. The model also includes a retrograde signaling component with a retrograde messenger that selectively generates a molecular uptake signal, and a postsynaptic receptor component. The retrograde messenger acts on a presynaptic target to modulate the plasticity parameter and activity spike strength of the presynaptic component based upon a calculated molecular uptake at the postsynaptic receptor component to generate the molecular uptake signal which is then transmitted to the presynaptic component.