Neurostimulation Pattern Composition with Neuronal Network Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neurostimulation systems are limited by their inability to deliver customized and complex patterns of neurostimulation pulses that emulate natural neural signals, leading to unintended sensations and side effects due to the lack of post-manufacturing programmability and pre-defined stimulation patterns.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for programming neurostimulation patterns using a user interface that allows for the customization of neurostimulation waveforms and patterns, including graphical editing and composition of pulses, bursts, trains, and sequences, utilizing neuronal models for personalized and efficient delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If pre-defined stimulation patterns are used at manufacturing time, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability and customization capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming complexityVSAvoidcustomization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static pre-defined patterns to dynamic programmable patterns that can be adjusted in real-time. The neurostimulator accepts and executes programmed pulse patterns with variable parameters including pulse width, amplitude, frequency, and duty cycle, allowing the stimulation pattern to adapt dynamically to patient needs and treatment requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention enables modification of multiple stimulation parameters including pulse width, amplitude, frequency, and duty cycle through programming. This allows the system to deliver customized pulse patterns by changing parameters post-manufacturing, thereby achieving adaptability without requiring complex hardware redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If simple uniform pulse patterns are delivered, then device complexity is reduced, but therapeutic efficacy deteriorates due to inability to emulate natural neural signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepulse pattern complexityVSAvoidtherapeutic efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic pulse delivery with programmable intervals and duty cycles to emulate natural neural signaling patterns. By delivering pulses in controlled sequences with varying frequencies and intervals, the system can mimic physiological neural activity patterns, thereby improving therapeutic efficacy while maintaining manageable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The neurostimulator delivers dynamic pulse patterns that can vary in amplitude, frequency, and timing to replicate the sophistication of natural neural signals. This dynamic capability allows the device to move beyond simple uniform pulses and achieve more effective therapy that mirrors physiological processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If sophisticated pulse patterns are programmed post-manufacturing, then adaptability and customization are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprogrammabilityVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves sophistication through parameter variation rather than structural complexity. By programmatically controlling pulse width, amplitude, frequency, and duty cycle parameters, the neurostimulator can deliver complex patterns without requiring complex hardware architecture, thereby balancing adaptability with manageable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If customized neurostimulation patterns are delivered, then side effects are reduced, but programming complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside effectsVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by delivering customized stimulation patterns targeted to specific neural pathways and regions. By programming precise pulse patterns that selectively activate desired neural circuits while avoiding non-targeted tissue, the system reduces side effects such as paresthesia and unwanted muscle contractions, balancing customization benefits with programming requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4134128B1System for composing neurostimulation patterns using a neuronal network model
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 BOSTON SCI NEUROMODULATION CORP
  • EP4134128B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP4134128B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP4134128B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An example of a system for programming a neurostimulator may include a storage device and a pattern generator. The storage device may store a pattern library and one or more neuronal network models. The pattern library may include fields and waveforms of neuromodulation. The one or more neuronal network models may each be configured to allow for evaluating effects of one or more fields in combination with one or more waveforms in treating one or more indications for neuromodulation. The pattern generator may be configured to construct and approximately optimize a spatio-temporal pattern of neurostimulation and/or its building blocks using at least one neuronal network model.