Neurophysiological State Prediction via Machine Learning Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for improved methods and systems to characterize and recognize physiological and brain states that correlate with different levels of performance across various fields, and to develop data-based intervention and training programs that can efficiently harness this knowledge for accelerated learning and enhanced productivity.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that collect behavioral and neurophysiological data, use machine learning to identify probabilistic relationships between neurophysiological data and performance, and apply this information to predict and enhance cognitive decision-making and performance by training a machine learning system with behavioral and neurophysiological data to estimate functional connectivity patterns and provide feedback for optimal behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional performance assessment methods are used, then simplicity and ease of operation are maintained, but measurement precision and ability to identify optimal brain states are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision in identifying brain states correlated with performanceVSAvoidcomplexity of data collection and analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of performance assessment into distinct components: neurophysiological data collection (EEG, eye tracking), behavioral data collection (task performance metrics), and integrated analysis. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system manageability despite the increased measurement precision achieved through multiple data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces computational models and algorithms as intermediaries that bridge the gap between raw neurophysiological data and performance assessment. These intermediaries process and integrate complex neural signals, transforming them into actionable performance metrics without requiring direct complex interaction between sensors and assessment outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive neurophysiological data collection is implemented, then measurement precision and predictive capability are improved, but loss of time for data processing and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in predicting performance outcomesVSAvoidtime required for data processing and analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of neurophysiological data during the data collection phase, extracting relevant features and patterns before formal analysis begins. This preliminary action reduces the computational burden during subsequent analysis, maintaining high measurement precision while reducing the time loss associated with processing comprehensive datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional manual or mechanical data processing methods with automated computational algorithms and machine learning models. This substitution enables rapid processing of comprehensive neurophysiological data, achieving high measurement precision without proportional increases in processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If detailed brain state characterization is achieved through multiple sensors and methods, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and difficulty of detecting and measuring optimal states increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetail in characterizing brain statesVSAvoidcomplexity in identifying characteristic brain states
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges data from multiple sensors (EEG, eye tracking) and measurement methods into a unified analysis framework. This merging integrates diverse data streams while reducing the overall difficulty of detection and measurement by processing them together through coordinated algorithms rather than as separate complex tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where initial analysis results guide subsequent data collection and processing priorities. This feedback loop refines brain state characterization over time, improving measurement precision while reducing the apparent complexity by focusing computational resources on the most informative data patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20220133194A1Measuring and strengthening physiological/neurophysiological states predictive of superior performance
Publication Date: 2022.05.05 OPTIOS INC
  • US20220133194A1 patent drawing
  • US20220133194A1 patent drawing
  • US20220133194A1 patent drawing

AI summary

To identify physiological states that are predictive of a person's performance, a system provides physiological and behavioral interfaces and a data processing pipeline. Physiological sensors generate physiological data about the person while performing a task. The behavioral interface generates performance data about the person while performing the task. The pipeline collects the physiological and performance data along with reference data from a population of people performing the same or similar tasks. In various implementations, the physiological states are brain states. In one implementation, the pipeline computes bandpower ratios. In another implementation, the pipeline decomposes the physiological data into frequency-banded components, identifies brain states derived from the decomposed data—for example, clusters of correlations of decomposed data envelopes—grades the performance data, compares the graded performance data to the brain states, and identifies statistical relationships between the brain states and levels of performance.