Non-Invasive Neurostimulation Calibration via Phase Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-invasive CR stimulation methods face challenges in accurately calibrating stimulation parameters without expert intervention, particularly in determining suitable target sites on the body surface for effective mechanically tactile and thermal neurostimulation, which affects treatment efficacy and increases the risk of side effects.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus comprising a control and analysis unit, a stimulation unit, and a measuring unit that automatically calibrates stimulation parameters based on electrophysiological signals, using sensors to monitor neuronal activity and adjust stimuli to achieve phase reset and desynchronization, allowing for independent, examiner-free calibration and precise targeting of stimulation sites.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If non-invasive CR stimulation is used, then accessibility and cost are improved, but calibration precision and localization accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility and costVSAvoidcalibration precision and localization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic self-calibration by detecting the patient's own electrophysiological signals (EMG, EEG, ECG) and using these signals to determine optimal stimulation parameters and body surface locations, eliminating the need for expert manual calibration while maintaining high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors electrophysiological signals during calibration and therapy delivery, using real-time feedback to adjust stimulation parameters and confirm accurate targeting of the intended neuronal populations, thereby ensuring high localization accuracy without requiring invasive procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If manual calibration by examiner is used, then stimulation parameter accuracy may be improved, but examination time and patient burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation parameter accuracyVSAvoidexamination time and patient burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs calibration by detecting electrophysiological signals and computing optimal stimulation parameters without requiring manual intervention from an examiner, thereby maintaining accuracy while dramatically reducing examination time and patient burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs rapid automated calibration before therapy delivery, using pre-recorded electrophysiological signals to determine stimulation parameters in advance, which eliminates the need for time-consuming manual calibration procedures during patient visits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If stimulation targets are not accurately localized, then device simplicity is maintained, but treatment efficacy decreases and side effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidtreatment efficacy and side effect reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex manual localization procedures with automated detection of electrophysiological signals (EMG, EEG, ECG) to identify optimal stimulation sites on the body surface, achieving high localization accuracy while maintaining relative device simplicity through software-based solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses electrophysiological signals as an intermediary to bridge the gap between the external stimulator and the target neuronal populations in the brain, allowing accurate non-invasive targeting without requiring direct access to or complex manipulation of deep brain structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus enables effective therapy with reduced side effects, shorter and more tolerable calibration processes for patients, and achieves precise stimulation parameter settings, improving treatment outcomes for neurological and psychiatric diseases by ensuring accurate stimulation of target neuronal populations.

Implementation Method 1

a measuring unit (12) arranged to detect electrophysiological signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrophysiological signal detection:

Implementation Method 2

by means of sensory, e.g. vibrotactile, stimuli

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical vibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 3

mechanically tactile and/or thermal CR stimulation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal stimulation: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11744514B2Device and method for calibrating a non-invasive mechanically tactile and/or thermal neurostimulation
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 GRETAP AG
  • US11744514B2 patent drawing
  • US11744514B2 patent drawing
  • US11744514B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for stimulating neurons that includes a stimulation unit that applies mechanically tactile and/or thermal stimuli to the body surface of a patient that stimulate neurons with a pathologically synchronous and oscillatory neural activity. The device includes a measuring unit that records measurement signals of neural activity of the stimulated neurons, and a controller that controls the stimulation unit and analyzes the measurement signals. The controller actuates the stimulation unit to scan at least one part of the body surface of the patient along a path and thereby periodically applies stimuli and also selects two regions or more regions on the patient's body surface along the path where the phase synchronization between the periodic application of the stimuli and the neural activity of the stimulated neurons have a local maximum using the measurement signals. The stimuli are then applied in a delayed manner in the two regions.