Closed-loop neurostimulation latency compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neuromodulation systems fail to provide adaptive and automatic neurostimulation interventions based on real-time monitoring of neurophysiological signals, lacking individualization and precision in timing and stimulation adaptation.

Innovation Solution

A system that continuously monitors neurophysiological signals, measures latencies, and adjusts neurostimulation protocols in real-time to administer targeted interventions during specific temporal regions of interest, classifying and replicating signal properties for personalized stimulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple threshold crossing is used to trigger intervention, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and adaptability of neurostimulation to individual brain states deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidneurophysiological signal classification precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static threshold-based triggering to dynamic, adaptive classification of neurophysiological signals. The machine learning model continuously analyzes brain state characteristics and adjusts stimulation parameters accordingly, enabling the system to adapt to individual neural patterns while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the triggering parameters from fixed thresholds to dynamically adjusted stimulation parameters based on classified brain states. The system modifies stimulation characteristics (timing, intensity, duration) according to the specific neurophysiological state detected, thereby improving precision without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If state-based triggering of static audio stimuli is used, then adaptability to brain states is improved, but timing precision and latency of neurostimulation intervention deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrain state adaptabilityVSAvoidstimulation latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of brain states and prediction of optimal stimulation timing before actually delivering the intervention. By anticipating the optimal moment for stimulation based on ongoing neurophysiological patterns, the system reduces latency while maintaining state-based adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements closed-loop feedback where the system continuously monitors neurophysiological responses and adjusts stimulation timing accordingly. This feedback mechanism allows the system to optimize the timing of interventions in real-time, reducing latency while preserving adaptability to individual brain states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If predetermined library of stimulation protocols is used, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to individual neurophysiological properties deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidindividualization of stimulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically classifying brain states and selecting appropriate stimulation protocols without requiring manual configuration. The machine learning model autonomously adapts stimulation parameters to individual neurophysiological properties, maintaining ease of operation while achieving high levels of personalization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a universal system that can handle multiple brain states and individual variations through a single integrated platform. The machine learning model serves multiple functions (classification, prediction, parameter adjustment) within one system, maintaining operational simplicity while providing tailored stimulation for each user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If continuous method of generating stimulation predictions is used, then productivity of neurostimulation delivery is improved, but measurement precision of phase and frequency prediction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestimulation delivery efficiencyVSAvoidphase and frequency prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic prediction methods that continuously update phase and frequency estimates based on ongoing neurophysiological signals. The machine learning model adapts its predictions in real-time according to changing brain states, maintaining both high productivity through continuous processing and precision through adaptive algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10413724B2Method for low latency automated closed-loop synchronization of neurostimulation interventions to neurophysiological activity
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 HRL LAB
  • US10413724B2 patent drawing
  • US10413724B2 patent drawing
  • US10413724B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described is a system for synchronization of neurostimulation interventions. The system continuously monitors incoming neurophysiological signals. Latencies present in the monitoring of the incoming neurophysiological signals are measured. Based on the measured latencies, the timing of targeted neurostimulation interventions is determined, resulting in a neurostimulation intervention protocol. The neurostimulation intervention protocol is adjusted in real time for administration of neurostimulation during temporal regions of interest. The system then triggers administration of the neurostimulation during the temporal regions of interest.